Posted in Affordable Housing, BOCC, St. Johns County

Update on the January 17 St. Johns County Board of County Commissioners Meeting

The first St. Johns County Board of County Commissioners meeting for 2023 was a LONG one!

As predicted, the first Regular Agenda item of the day took about 4 hours pushing many agenda items into late afternoon. The meeting ran for almost 8 hours, including a 30 minute lunch break.

Highlights of the meeting opening items were the Ceremonial Swearing in of Commissioner Roy Alaimo by one of our newly elected County Judges, The Honorable Casey Woolsey.

Public Safety Update

The Public Safety Update for the morning featured newly appointed Interim Fire Chief Scott Bullard. Chief Bullard reported the year end totals of calls for the Fire Rescue being 61,373 total calls with 25,558 of those being EMS calls. 17,225 calls required transport of patients.

The St. Johns County Sheriff’s Office update came from Russ Martin, Director of Operations. Director Martin reported that vehicle and commercial burglaries continue to be the highest number of crimes in the county and encouraged residents to hold each other accountable to communicate with neighbors and others and remind folks to take your valuables out of your cars and lock your car doors.

Regular Agenda Items

As anticipated, most of the morning was taken up by the presentation of the Colonel Hinman Intermodal Exchange Facility (CHIEF) proposed in District 3. This topic took 4 hours in the Planning and Zoning Agency meeting and similarly, took about 4 hours of the County Commissioners Meeting.

CHIEF was presented on behalf of Colonel Hinman by James Whitehouse and Heather Neville.

Reminder “What is CHIEF?”

This is a “Request for a Large-Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the Future Land Use Map designation of approximately 214.13 acres of land, located at 2775 County Road 214, from Residential-B (Res-B) to Industrial (I) with a text amendment prohibiting Heavy Industrial uses on the subject property.”

What is included in this proposal?

“This is a request to amend the Future Land Use Map from Residential-B (Res-B) to Industrial (I) for approximately 214.13 acres of land to allow for an Intermodal Distribution Facility with rail access to the adjoining Florida East Coast railway. The facility is proposed to contain up to 900,000 square feet of warehouse, intermodal terminal uses, and a commuter rail service. A text amendment has been provided by the applicant that prohibits Heavy Industrial uses on the subject property, which would be a permitted use within the Industrial Future Land Use Map designation.”

Full document with details can be found here:

CHIEF Request for approval

There were many people in the audience wearing green buttons that said “Say Yes to High paying jobs in St. Augustine.” These were people prepared to speak in favor of the proposal for the CHIEF project.

Concerns about the proposal

There are several concerns about this proposal, not least of them being that the property is bounded by residential areas and would have impact on longtime and future residents of this part of the county.

The applicant provided an Economic Impact Study indicating the proposed project would “support over 3,000 jobs, generating $137 million in annual earnings and contribute $374 million to GDP.” This would be generated by building 850,000 sq. ft of warehousing space and a 50,000 sq. ft. intermodal truck terminal.

At the time of review with the PZA, there were still several outstanding staff comments from the county zoning division. It did not appear those questions had been answered before the County Commissioners Meeting.

Included in the comments are several concerns from the Environmental Division because this property is surrounded by residential land and is also adjacent to Moultrie Creek and to Conservation Easements. Even with the prohibition on heavy industrial uses, the Industrial category permits high intensity use that is “potentially inconsistent with surrounding environmentally sensitive areas.” Notably part of the wetlands included in this property are part of the floodway headwaters to Moultrie Creek.

Much of the presentation focused on the jobs and benefit to the county by building this Intermodal Facility.

Post Presentation Comments:

At the conclusion of the presentation, Commissioner Joseph asked a question about how a piece of property could get access to the rail line, as included in the proposal. The answer about the process included an acknowledgement that the property owner does not have that access at this point.

Commissioner Joseph also asked about access to I-95 and how could this be successful without clear access to I-95. This led to a discussion about the 2 lane roads that would have be to traversed by heavy truck traffic to get to I-95, should this be approved.

As Public Comment began, one speaker was recognized speaking on behalf of the Vermont Heights Community, Colonel Thomas Mark Turner. Because he was representing a list of 23 residents, he was allowed to speak for 10 minutes. He presented himself as a Master Planner and laid out the reasons why this property was the wrong location for the proposed project.

Public Comment went on for over an hour before it was interrupted by the “Time Certain for Public Comment” scheduled for 11:30 – 12:00. While the intent of the “Time Certain” for public comment is positive, it seems to be disruptive to the process to interject public comment in the middle of the on-going presentation.

Interruption for Time Certain Public Comment

General Public Comment in the “Time Certain” portion included comments from residents of Marsh Landing who are STILL seeking solutions to the flooding issues in Marsh Landing. This topic has been coming up for many months and has yet to be resolved.

Some public comments included what has become a trend recently, a reminder to the Commissioners of the Oath of Office they swore to, “To protect citizens against all enemies, foreign and domestic.” We saw this at the Legislative update earlier in January, as well.

Back to CHIEF Presentation

After this “Time Certain” and a lunch break of 30 minutes, the Commissioners returned to the topic of the CHIEF proposal. Mr. Whitehouse spent 30 minutes on his rebuttal to the public comments and questions.

All Commissioners acknowledged the economic benefits of the project, but the over-riding concerns were about compatibility with the surrounding neighborhoods and the traffic considerations on the existing roads. The project was unanimously denied after over 4 hours of discussion.

2023 Roadway and Transportation List of Priority Projects

The list of projects presented is found at this link:

2023 Transportation Priority Projects

Some highlights include continued work on CR 2209, the CR 210 and US1 Interchange, a Planning study for an Intermodal Transportation Center (Not the CHIEF project being proposed in Tuesday’s meeting), and a study for a Southeast Commuter Rail Service from Downton Jacksonville to St. Augustine (also not the CHIEF proposal of Tuesday’s meeting.)

Commissioner Dean recommended an amendment moving Item #4, the widening of SR 16 from International Golf Parkway to Outlet Mall Entrance to #1, thus shifting everything else down one row. This amendment was approved 4:1 so the list, as amended, was approved.

Public Housing Authority

Item #9 on the agenda was an Informational presentation on a Public Housing Authority (PHA) for St. Johns County. This presentation was intended to share the objectives of a PHA and the process for creating a PHA should the BOCC decide to act on the request from numerous St. Johns County residents to implement a PHA.

The presentation can be found here:

Public Housing Authority Presentation

Several residents spoke about the need for a Public Housing Authority as another way to create affordable housing options in the county. Commissioners Joseph, Alaimo, and Whitehurst spoke against the need for the additional bureaucracy of a public housing authority. Commissioners Arnold and Dean spoke in favor. The vote for a Public Housing Authority failed 3:2.

Rather than summarize the discussion among the commissioners before their vote, readers may be interested in hearing the discussion directly from the Commissioners. It can be found here:

Commissioners Comments on PHA

State of the County

The last big item on the agenda Tuesday (Item 14) was the State of the County presented by our County Administrator, Hunter Conrad.

A video was presented and can be viewed here:

Video on State of the County

Closing Comments

As anticipated, in closing Public Comments there was a concern raised about the appointment of Commissioner Alaimo as he does not currently live in District 3.

Closing comments from the Commissioners included:

– a suggestion from Commissioner Joseph to start a small marketing campaign to encourage citizens to work on beautifying the county.

– an ask from Commissioner Whitehurst to Legal to look into an ordinance about panhandling as Clay County recently successfully passed a panhandling ordinance.

It was, indeed, a long, long day with the Commissioners. There will be a follow-up article on the Public Housing Authority request. Watch for it!

Posted in Affordable Housing, BOCC, St. Johns County

What’s on the St. Johns County BOCC Agenda for January 17?

The Agenda for the January 17 Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) Meeting has some interesting topics included. It could be a very long day!

Why?

The items at the beginning of every BOCC meeting are generally benign and, with one exception, Tuesday is no different.

The meetings always begin with Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance, the Clerk of Court’s Report, Deletions and Additions to the Consent Agenda and Regular Agenda and Approval of the Regular Agenda.

One item in the beginning of the agenda for Tuesday that may have some interest during public comment is the “Ceremonial Oath of Office” for our newest Commissioner, Roy Alaimo, who was appointed by Governor DeSantis in December.

Why is this of particular interest? Word is, he was formally sworn in in December and has already been speaking with constituents. That may be cause for some of our County Activists who were concerned about this appointment to speak out about that during Public Comment.

There is 30 minutes at a Time Certain from 11:30 – 12:00 PM for Public Comments.

There are two items up for discussion at Tuesday’s Meeting that could take up a good portion of the meeting. Agenda Items 1 and 2 are about the Colonel Hinman Intermodal Exchange Facility (CHIEF) being proposed in District 3. This topic was the only item covered in the 4-hour Planning and Zoning Agency (PZA) meeting last week. Video and transcript of the meeting can be found here:

PZA Meeting – January 5

What is CHIEF?

The Background Information in Tuesday’s Agenda says this is a “Request for a Large-Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the Future Land Use Map designation of approximately 214.13 acres of land, located at 2775 County Road 214, from Residential-B (Res-B) to Industrial (I) with a text amendment prohibiting Heavy Industrial uses on the subject property.”

After the 4-hour discussion at the PZA, there was not a majority vote obtained so this was considered a denial of the application that now comes to the BOCC for approval to transmit to the State.

You can read more about CHIEF in this article from the Jacksonville Business Journal (warning – paywall.)

JAX Biz Journal – CHIEF

The intent of “Transmittal to the state” is for the state agencies to review and send back their comments and concerns, or approval. We have seen in the past that there is seldom much feedback from the State.  

What is included in this proposal?

“This is a request to amend the Future Land Use Map from Residential-B (Res-B) to Industrial (I) for approximately 214.13 acres of land to allow for an Intermodal Distribution Facility with rail access to the adjoining Florida East Coast railway. The facility is proposed to contain up to 900,000 square feet of warehouse, intermodal terminal uses, and a commuter rail service. A text amendment has been provided by the applicant that prohibits Heavy Industrial uses on the subject property, which would be a permitted use within the Industrial Future Land Use Map designation.”

Full document with details can be found here:

CHIEF BOCC Agenda Item

Concerns about the proposal

There are several concerns raised about this proposal, not least of them being that the property is bounded by residential areas and would have impact on existing longtime and future residents of this part of the county.

Some interesting details were brought out in the PZA meeting about the proposal last week. The applicant states that the potential Commuter Rail system was discussed with Jacksonville Transit Authority (JTA)and that JTA is in favor of the proposed Commuter Rail Station at this location. They also indicate that the Florida East Coast (FEC) railway supports the proposed project that would be utilizing their rail lines. It does not appear that any documentation was provided to back up the verbal assertions by the applicant.

The applicant provided an Economic Impact Study indicating the proposed project would “support over 3,000 jobs, generating $137 million in annual earnings and contribute $374 million to GDP.” This would be generated by building 850,000 sq. ft of warehousing space and a 50,000 sq. ft. intermodal truck terminal.

At the time of review with the PZA, there were still several outstanding staff comments from the county zoning division. Included in the comments are concerns from the Environmental Division because this property is surrounded by residential land and is also adjacent to Moultrie Creek and to Conservation Easements. Even with the prohibition on heavy industrial uses, the Industrial category permits high intensity use that is “potentially inconsistent with surrounding environmentally sensitive areas.” Notably part of the wetlands included in this property are part of the floodway headwaters to Moultrie Creek.

Also, during the PZA meeting there was lively discussion about clearing that has taken place on the property that may not have been approved through the appropriate state agencies. While the applicant asserted they were in compliance with Florida Statutes, there was little to no documentation provided supporting that assertion and one member of the PZA pushed back that this clearing was not in line with accepted Best Practices.

With the many concerns raised during the PZA meeting and the numerous concerns from neighboring residents, this discussion at Tuesday’s BOCC meeting promises to be lively!

Roadway Priority Projects

Also on the Agenda for Tuesday is Item 8, the 2023 Roadway and Transportation List of Priority Projects. This is the list of project priorities that the county is asking to be prioritized for potential funding in the new fiscal year of FDOT’s Work Program.

The full list of proposed projects can be found in the Agenda item here:

St. Johns County Priority Projects Agenda

Some highlights include continued work on CR 2209, the CR 210 and US1 Interchange, a Planning study for an Intermodal Transportation Center (Not the CHIEF project being proposed in Tuesday’s meeting), and a study for a Southeast Commuter Rail Service from Downton Jacksonville to St. Augustine (also not the CHIEF proposal of Tuesday’s meeting.)

Public Housing Authority

Item #9 on the agenda is an Information presentation on a Public Housing Authority (PHA) for St. Johns County. This presentation will share the objectives of a PHA and the process for creating a PHA should the BOCC decide to act on the request from concerned St. Johns County residents to implement a PHA.

As I have written previously, St. Johns County has an affordable housing problem and a PHA could potentially be one tool to help address that problem. I have heard from residents both for and against the creation of a PHA so this should be an interesting topic on Tuesday.

State of the County

The last big item on the agenda Tuesday (Item 14) will be the State of the County presented by our County Administrator, Hunter Conrad.

Tuesday promises to be a long and interesting day for the BOCC meeting! Pack a lunch!

I’ll be reporting back on the highlights later in the week.

Posted in Affordable Housing, St. Johns County

St. Johns County and the Affordable Housing Issue

St. Johns County Affordable Housing Update

At the December 20 Board of County Commissioners meeting, the annual update from the Affordable Housing Advisory Committee (AHAC) for St. Johns County was presented.

I’ve heard from many in our county that there is no issue with affordable housing in St. Johns County. The AHAC report provided to the Commissioners provides real data demostrating this to be a fallacy.

What is Affordable Housing?

That depends. It depends on the size of the household. A single person with no dependents making $60,000 a year is in a good place for renting an apartment. It’s a different story when that person making $60,000 a year has 2 or 3 children to support and no other income.

The AHAC is all about Affordable Housing. They are primarily focused on workers making $48,000 or below.  These are the folks who keep this county running, the workers we depend on day-in and day-out to provide for basic needs in the county. Are we providing for THEIR basic needs?

Let’s dig into the numbers

With a goal of 30% of gross income going towards housing, a person making $60,000 a year can spend about $1500 on rent or a mortgage payment.

How realistic is that in St. Johns County? Not very.

Fair Market Rent for a 2 bedroom apartment in St. Johns County, (if you can find one,) is $1542. That’s a 39% increase over 2021 rates. To afford that rent, an individual needs to be making $22.45 an hour, or $48,000 a year.

The median home prices in St. Johns County is $490,000. To afford to buy a home in this county, a household income of over $165,000 is required. That means that even if you have a dual income household with each adult making $48,000 a year, they still can’t afford to buy a home in St. Johns County.

Even though there are around 500 building permits issued every month, the average value for those homes is $265,000. Only about 5% of those homes would be considered “workforce” housing.

Employment

What type of employees earn less than $48,000, not enough to rent an apartment or buy a home in St. Johns County?

  • Restaurant workers – four restaurants closed in the last quarter because of staffing difficulties.
  • Hospitality workers – our hotels run with these workers
  • Arts, Entertainment and Recreation workers – who staff our museums and theaters?
  • Retail workers – complained lately about lack of service in the stores?
  • Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting – when we clamor to save our farmland, are we considering where those farm workers can afford to live?
  • Educational Services – starting salary for a teacher in St. Johns County? What about the administrative staff in the schools?
  • Trade, Transportation and Utilities workers

76,000 employees in St. Johns County earn less than $22.85 an hour. That’s 76,000 people who cannot afford to rent or buy in this county.

Over 10,000 families in St. Johns County spend more than 50% of their income on housing. These are people already here – many of whom were born and raised here. They can no longer afford to live here.

Recommendations

The AHAC has recommendations.

  1. Impact and utility fee connection relief
  2. Where possible, build near transportation hubs
  3. Incentivize flexible density strategies (duplexes, apartments, townhomes)
  4. Make use of the inventory of SJC properties available for affordable housing

Proposed Solutions?

There is a great need for public/private partnerships to address the need for more workforce housing in the county. The county needs more options for rental and home ownership for our workforce.

We need programs to provide financial literacy to help prepare residents for home ownership.

Workforce Housing

Last Tuesday’s report focused just on Affordable Housing. That report didn’t touch on the next income level. That is the next tier, those employees in our county making between $48,000 and $60,000 a year.

These are our teachers, deputies, firefighters, factory workers, nurses, healthcare workers, and other trades people.

They can’t afford to live here either.

Going back to our Median Home price of $490,000, even a working couple at the top end of our median workforce, making $60,000 each, cannot afford to buy a home in St. Johns County. Remember, you need a household income of $165,000 to afford to buy a home in St. Johns County.

We need solutions for Workforce Housing, as well. Not just Affordable Housing. And the answer isn’t to just pay people more. Salary increases for our public service workers like first responders will need to be funded by us – and we know that residents don’t want increased taxes. Salary increases for our private sector employees mean increased prices – and we already have complaints about the high cost of healthcare and goods.

We need to work together to find better solutions.

What are your solutions?