Posted in BOCC, Budget, St. Johns County

What’s Ahead in St. Johns County the week of May 5

There is no shortage of public meetings of importance to the county next week. Let’s take a look at the most critical.

Budget Meetings

Budget season for St. Johns County begins in earnest next week with scheduled presentations of departmental budgets.

County Administrator Joy Andrews released a newsletter last week sharing how to listen in to the Budget process. The Fiscal Year 2026 Budget Disclosure Series begins next week and everyone can watch and ask questions!

These meetings are meetings between the Operational Department leaders and the County Administrator, reviewing their “proposed levels of service and requested funding need to accomplish those service goals and operations.”

Between May 8 and May 13, 2025, each County department will be presenting their operational needs and priorities. If you’ve ever wondered how they come up with these numbers or where the money goes, this is great opportunity to watch the process!

Each session will be broadcast live and recorded so you can watch in real-time or later. They will also have available public viewing areas if you want to be “in the room”.

The meetings will be held at the St. Johns County Administration Building, 500 San Sebastian View in St. Augustine. There will be limited seating in the conference room for in-person attendance and additional space in the auditorium where they will broadcast the meetings live. Or you can watch from the comfort of home on GTV. Link here: St. Johns County GTV

If you have feedback or questions, you can email the team at budget2026@sjcfl.us

If you are interested in specific topics, here is the line-up:

May 8 – 1:00 – 5:00 PM

  • Health & Human Services
  • Office of Performance & Transparency
  • Purchasing and Contract Management
  • Economic Development
  • Public Works and Solid Waste

May 9 – 9:30 AM – 12:30 PM

  • Building Services and Code Enforcement
  • Growth Management
  • Medical Examiner
  • Utility Services

May 9 – 2 – 4:30 PM

  • Health Department
  • Administration/Board of County Commissioners/Office of Management & Budget
  • Office of Intergovernmental Affairs
  • Office of Public Affairs

May 12 – 9:30 AM – 12:30 PM

  • Library Services
  • Parks & Recreation
  • County Attorney
  • Management Information Systems

May 12 – 2 – 4:00 PM

  • Community Partners

May 13 – 9:30 AM – 12:30 PM

  • Public Safety
  • Human Resources and Risk Management
  • Agricultural Extension Services
  • Veterans Services

May 13 – 2 – 5:00 PM

  • Facilities Management
  • Land Management
  • Emergency Management/Coastal Management/Disaster Recovery
  • Tourism and Development

Learn more about the process here: 2026 Budget


Besides the Budget series beginning next week, there is the regularly scheduled BOCC meeting. There are some interesting topics on the agenda and I’ve already seen some mis-representation on social media. Before you plan to show up about a specific topic, learn more about what will be presented.

Let’s walk through the Agenda.

Regular Agenda Items

Agenda Item 1 Tidal 210 – Request to rezone approximately 65 acres of land from Commercial Highway and Tourist to Planned Unit Development for the development of a maximum of 297 townhome units. This was heard by the PZA and failed with a 3:3 vote (Labanowski, Hilsenbeck, Speigel voting no.

Background materials can be found here: Tidal 210 PUD

Location of Tidal 210

Agenda Item 2Comprehensive Plan Update: Population Projections – the vendor supporting the process for the Comprehensive Plan was instructed to use Medium Population projections for the County as they prepare the Comprehensive Plan. This is their assessment.

Materials are here: Comp Plan Update


Agenda Item 3Amendment to the Irrigation Ordinance regulating the consumptive use of water for landscape irrigation. Proposed change will bring St. Johns County Utilities in conformity with best practices suggested by the St. Johns River Water Management District’s goals for water conservation.

The amended section is here (change in red):

Section 5. Exceptions to Landscape Irrigation Schedule. Landscape irrigation shall be subject to the following irrigation schedule exceptions:

A. Irrigation using a micro-spray, micro-jet, drip or bubbler irrigation system is allowed anytime.

B. Irrigation of new landscape is allowed at any time of day on any day for 30 days immediately following planting/installation and every other day for the next 30 days for a total of one 60- day period, provided that the irrigation is limited to the minimum amount necessary for such landscape establishment.

C. Watering in of chemicals, including insecticides, pesticides, fertilizers, fungicides, and herbicides, when required by law, the manufacturer, or best management practices, is allowed at any time of day on any day within 24 hours of application. Watering in of chemicals shall not exceed ¼ inch of water per application except as otherwise required by law, the manufacturer, or best management practices.

D. Irrigation systems may be operated at any time of day on any day for necessary maintenance and repair purposes not to exceed 20 minutes per hour per zone.

E. Irrigation using a hand-held hose equipped with an automatic shut-off nozzle is allowed at any time of day on any day.

F. Discharge of water from a water-to-air air-conditioning unit or other water-dependent cooling system is not limited by this Ordinance.

G. The use of water from a reclaimed water system is allowed anytime unless restricted by a utility provider for operational needs as permitted by law. For the purpose of this paragraph, a reclaimed water system includes systems in which the primary source is reclaimed water, which may or may not be supplemented from another source during peak demand periods.


Agenda Item 4Amending the SJC Utilities Ordinance – Second Reading

During a recent Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) inspection of the Utilities Pretreatment Program, it was discovered that the current Utility Ordinance did not give delegation authorization from the Utility Director to the Pretreatment Coordinator. It was also noted that the Ordinance did not define a timeline for reviewing data and issuing or denying Pretreatment permits. These minor amendments (pages 42 and 52) to the Utility Ordinance will address the changes FDEP requested during the Pretreatment inspection. First Reading was held April 1, 2025.


Agenda Item 5Rezoning SR 207/Helen Road Commercial – Request to rezone approximately .97 acres of land at 180 State Road 207 from Residential, Manufactured/Mobile Home to Commercial Intensive. The applicant intends to develop the overall site to include office, self-storage and flex warehousing.

Materials are here: Agenda Item 5


Agenda Item 61235 S. Winterhawk Drive – Request for a Non-Zoning variance to allow for an access easement within a platted subdivision


Agenda Item 7FLUEDRA Mediation update: Robinson Improvement Company – This is an item that needs to be understood in it’s entirety. I’ve seen encouragement to show up on Tuesday to tell the BOCC to deny this request. That is not one of the options for Tuesday. Read on.

“On November 5, 2024, the Board denied Robinson Improvement Company’s request to rezone 2,763 acres to PUD (PUD2024-09). The property is located north of County Road 214, south of County Road 208, and between I-95 and County Road 13A. Robinson Improvement filed a request for relief from the denial under the Florida Land Use and Environmental Dispute Resolution Act (“FLUEDRA”). FLUEDRA provides a means to potentially resolve disputes pre-suit through a special magistrate mediation and hearing process. The special magistrate mediation occurred on March 28, 2025. During the mediation, Robinson Improvement presented a revised plan providing more site detail, including a neighborhood commercial component. The parties agreed that, contingent on Board approval, Robinson Improvement could proceed to a public rezoning hearing on the revised plan. If the Board does not approve scheduling the new rezoning hearing, the parties will proceed to a public hearing before the special magistrate regarding the FLUEDRA request.”

Relief is being sought by the developer under FLUEDRA, aimed at resolving the dispute between the developer and the county without litigation.

You can read the FLUEDRA statute here: FLUEDRA Statute

There are two options for the Commission on Tuesday:

OPTION 1: Motion to rehear PUD2024-09 and authorize the scheduling of a public rezoning hearing complying with public notice and advertising requirements.

OPTION 2: Take no action and allow the matter to proceed to a public hearing before the special magistrate.

Note that there is no option to deny the development at this meeting. Either it gets scheduled for another rezoning hearing or no action is taken, allowing this challenge to go before the special magistrate.

This article in the Jacksonville Daily Record lays out some of the details: Agrihood – Second Chance


The full agenda for Tuesday can be found here: May 6 BOCC Agenda


If you are finding value in these updates, please subscribe to my blog so you get notifications when I publish an update. Feel free to share with others who may find value in the content.

Posted in BOCC, St. Johns County

Recap of the April 15, 2025 St. Johns County Board of County Commissioner’s Meeting

The meeting began and ended with important discussions that highlight the on-going discord with the current Board of County Commissioners. Residents have expressed their desire to see some of these disagreements put aside so the Commissioners can get on with the business of the County. Read on for more information.


Mental Health Awareness Month

Commissioner Sarah Arnold presented the Proclamation for Mental Health Awareness Month. Accepting the proclamation were representatives from families and organizations working with Mental Health issues in the community.

Watch the Proclamation presentation here: Mental Health Awareness Month

Learn more about two of the organizations at these links: Patients not Prisoners and SMA Healthcare

As someone who has seen first hand what mental health struggles can do to a family, I’m grateful for organizations like these and the Proclamation for Mental Health Awareness.


Public Safety Telecommunicators Week

The second proclamation of the day was for National Public Safety Telecommunicators Week. Appropriately presented by Commissioner Murphy, who began his law enforcement career in this field, this proclamation recognizes the work done by the dedicated folks who answer the call to 911, handling over 414,000 incoming and outgoing calls in St. Johns County last year.

You can watch the presentation here: Public Safety Telecommunicators Week

There were no additions or deletions to the Consent Agenda and it was approved.


Regular Agenda

Regular Agenda Item 1 – Request for Reimbursement of Attorney’s Fees.

Commissioner Joseph is requesting reimbursement of her attorney fees incurred when she filed suit against the Florida State’s Attorney and the County Commissioners. See the slides for more details on the events.

Screenshot

Following her attorney’s presentation, Commissioner Joseph asked if she was ever going to be put in jail. The attorney responded that at one point there were law enforcement vehicles outside her home in early morning hours and that caused her to worry that there would be a predawn raid. The attorney contacted the State’s Attorney’s office to discuss arranging a surrender for her arrest so that her husband would not be left without care. The State’s Attorney would not have the discussion.

Commissioner Taylor made a motion to move funds from the General Reserve fund and approve the amount of $139,005 in attorney’s fees for Commissioner Joseph. Commissioner Joseph seconded the motion.

After public comment, there were questions from the other Commissioners. Some of the questions and answers are paraphrased here:

Q – Has Commissioner Joseph paid this bill?

Answer – No, she still owes the attorney so the request is for the county taxpayers to pay the attorney’s fees for Commissioner Joseph

Q – What gave Commissioner Joseph the impression that there was going to be a pre-dawn raid?

Answer – There were law enforcement cards idling outside her house in the pre-dawn hours an that gave her concern. There was never any verification about why the law enforcement cars were outside of her home and never an arrest. She did believe they were there at the direction of the State’s Attorney’s Office.

Q – Why is Commissioner Joseph pursuing the County to reimburse her rather than the State’s Attorney’s Office which was pursuing the prosecution after the County Commissioners were dismissed from the lawsuit.

Answer – She is seeking reimbursement because these were fees incurred as part of her public duty.

Commissioner Murphy noted during discussions that the taxpayer is getting the bill both ways – to defend the Commissioners and to reimburse Commissioner Joseph for her fees.

Commissioner Murphy questioned the amount being requested and referred to an amount of $110,242 that had been deemed to be a “reasonable fee” and said he would support an amended motion for that amount. He would not support the total requested without an itemized bill for that amount.

Commissioner Arnold also asked about itemized bills and questioned the request being a reimbursement when the bill has not yet been paid. She would like for the topic to come back with more information in the request.

Commisioner Taylor amended her motion to $110,000, it was seconded by Commissioner Murphy and passed 3-2 with Arnold and Whitehurst being the No votes.

You can watch the presentation here: Agenda Item 1 – Reimbursement of Legal Fees


Agenda item 2The Shell at St. Augustine -a project to benefit local arts, culture and heritage organizations, provide a pathway to sustainability for the participating non-profits, increase tourism dollars for St. Johns County and enrich quality of life for local residents.

The organization has funding to build the building and are looking for a location to build. Consensus from the Board was for staff to work with the organization to help finding a location for this facility.

Organizations in the Alliance
Rendering of proposed facility
Desired Location

Watch the presentation here: The Shell


Agenda item 3Dog and Bog withdrawal of request. The applicants have determined they cannot develop the project and have located a local partner, Habitat for Humanity of St. Johns County, who are in discussions to purchase the project. Habitat for Humanity CEO Malinda Everson confirmed that Habitat is in the due diligence phase of moving forward with the purchase.

(Disclosure: I currently serve as the Treasurer on the Habitat for Humanity Board and did vote affirmatively to move forward with this purchase, dependent upon the outcome of the due diligence.)


Agenda Item 5 – change order to Phase 1 Design-Build Agreement for Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for Design-Build services for Silverleaf Fire Station #22 and Sheriff’s Operations Center. This was an item to process a change order to include Early Works in the project at a cost of $2,288,800. Approved unanimously

project scope

Agenda Item 6Amendment for Early Works packages for Central Community and Community Sportsplex Parks. Approved unanimously

Agenda Items 7– Appointment to the Housing Finance Authority. Robin Pfalzgraf was appointed unanimously.

Agenda Item 8County Attorney Agreement for Legal Services.

After discussion on the agreement and minor modifications, it was approved 3-2 (Taylor and Joseph being no votes.)

Once approved, Commissioner Joseph expressed her concern about signing the contract without confirmation that there would be no criminal repercussions. Attorney Kommando indicated there was no reason he knows of that she could not sign the agreement but if she were uncomfortable, she could delegate to someone else. She stated that is what she would do.

The agreement can be found here: County Attorney’s Legal Agreement

You can watch the video here: Discussion on County Attorney Agreement


Commissioner’s reports

Commissioner Whitehurst – Congratulations to the Gators on recent athletic wins. Very impressed with his tour of Saint Augustine Youth Services (SAYS) and recommended all commissioners should take that tour. Learn more about SAYS here: SAYS Website

Commissioner Whitehurst also shared a recap of his recent visits to Tallahassee and all the legislators he met with while in Tallahassee pursuing actions and funding on behalf of St. Johns County.

And concluded with Happy Easter to all those who celebrate

Commissioner Arnold – Also shared an update on the visits to Tallahassee. Taking off her Commissioner hat for a moment, she spoke about bills moving through the House and Senate right now that could potentially result in loss of funding to special programs in St. Johns County included IP, AP, AICE, CTE and Dual Enrollment programs. She encouraged all parents to do their own research, come to their own conclusions and reach out to the legislators if they are so inclined.

Commission Taylor – Shared an update on her visits to Tallahassee. She asked for clarification about the bill related to funding for the IGP and I-95 interchange. Senator Leek had pointed out that this item was number 6 on the priority list and she wanted clarification to Senator Leek that it is one the County’s Top priorities. She talked about a letter requesting the funding and wanted to include in the letter that the county is requesting $10 Million dollars in federal funding.

See previous post about the requested appropriations for IGP and I-95 improvements here: Florida Legislative Appropriations Process Blog

Commissioner Murphy – Shared he was wearing his Autism Awareness hat he got while attending a recent Re-Certification class with Old Town Trolley Tours.

He asked for consensus to direct staff to review some standing committees that have been inactive for some time. This will come back to the Board as an Agenda item.

He also talked about the trips to Tallahassee and the importance of the Commissioners going to Tallahassee and developing relationships that will allow them to bring home more money from Tallahassee. In order to meet the goal of a tax rollback, the county must have money from Tallahassee.

Commissioner Joseph raised a point that when they were in Tallahassee, Commissioners Arnold and Whitehurst were meeting with the legislators separately from Commissioners Joseph, Murphy, and Taylor. This devolved into a bit of a debate between Commissioners Joseph and Whitehurst that is worth watching at the link below.

Commissioner Joseph asked about updating the letter to Senator Leek about funding for the IGP-I-95 exchange. County Administrator Andrews explained that there are very careful discussions with Congressman Rutherford’s office about what that number might be and they do not want to submit a number that has not been agreed to by his office. (Again reference the process outlined in the link to a previous blog post above.)

Commissioner Joseph also sent Happy Anniversary wishes to her husband on their 35th Anniversary on April 16.

Watch the Reports here for more context and detail: Commissioner’s Reports


County Administrator’s Report

Administrator Andrews expressed appreciation to the Board for Rich Kommando’s contract and expressed that this is the most impressive legal team they have had at the county during her tenure. She also had the Director of Growth Management Mike Roberson provide an update on the Comprehensive Plan timeline.

Administrator Andrews provided an update on the situation with Indianhead Biomass. A letter was issued to the business with code violations. The county is working with them to address the violations. She shared that the company does provide a valuable service to the county as they are the only vendor who addresses our biomass collection. They are still awaiting results of a study to determine if the odor violates current standards but are also talking with the company to bring down the odors.


County Attorney’s Report

Attorney Kommando pointed out to the Board that there are more than Appropriations of concern in Tallahassee this session including bills concerning condo associations and local preemptions. Deputy Attorney Kealey West thanked the Board for the decision about Attorney Kommando, commenting that he has been here for a year, guiding through a tumultuous time and they office looks forward to his continued leadership.


If you are finding value in these updates, please subscribe to my blog so you get notifications when I publish an update. Feel free to share with others who may find value in the content.

Posted in BOCC, Comprehensive Plan, St. Johns County

What’s Ahead at the March 18 St. Johns County Board of County Commissioner’s Meeting?

While many County Residents are on Spring Break next week, our County Commissioners have some meaty topics on the agenda!

Consent Agenda Items

Did you know there is a Northeast Florida Coordinated Mobility Plan? Consent Agenda Item 3 is Approval of the Northeast Florida Coordinated Mobility Plan. Essentially, this provides funding through Federal Transit Administration grants to cover the Sunshine Bus Program.

Read more about it here: Northeast Florida Coordinated Mobility Plan Item


Regular Agenda Items

Item 1 on the Regular Agenda is Board Discussion of Land Development Code Article IV (Tree Ordinance.) There has been a lot of social media chatter about this one. Important to note, this is NOT a reading of a new Ordinance. That requires public notice and two formal hearings. Instead, this is a presentation to seek Board Guidance on updates to the code. There should not be any vote on an ordinance at this point.

At the March 4, 2025 BOCC Meeting, Commissioner Whitehurst made a motion to move the meeting to March 25 (one week later) because so many people would be away on Spring Break vacation March 18. Commissioners Joseph and Taylor felt very strongly that the discussion could not be moved to allow more people to attend.

Here’s the discussion item: Agenda Item 1

Reading the social media posts, one might think Tuesday is the day to vote on the ordinance, but it is not. Again, Ordinance changes have to be published and then go through 2 readings before being voted on. It will be interesting to see why there is such a push to have this discussion on March 18.

Objective: Facilitate BCC discussion on the previously proposed 14 Tree Goals. Background: On October 17, 2023 BCC directed staff to bring a discussion item on current St. Johns County tree protection regulations in the Land Development Code (LDC) and to revisit the 14 Tree Goals in the context of the Comprehensive Plan amendment process. On December 17, 2024 BCC directed staff to again present the 14 Tree Goals for further discussion. Since December 17, 2024 staff has met with Chair Joseph twice to discuss the goals. Table 1 is a summary of the original 14 Goals with notation of considerations of changes from these 2 discussions.”

The requested outcome of the discussion on the 18th is:

 “Staff is seeking Board direction on either of the following: 1. Provide staff with direction to bring further analysis on one or more goals for further discussion at a future date TBD. 2. No further action.”

Here’s a link to the October 2023 discussion item, that may be important to review prior to reading the proposed changes: Analysis of Proposed 14 Points to Save Trees

Those who proposed the 14 points have been vocal that this will mostly impact developers as they develop new communities. Any of us who live in St. Johns County appreciate the beauty of the trees in our county and are in favor of preserving as many trees as we can! And those of us who are homeowners enjoy having trees in our landscaping for the beauty and shade provided. As homeowners, we also know the cost of maintaining trees, especially in new developments where trees are often planted too close to the foundation or lot lines and have to be managed in later years as root systems develop, not always in ways that are good!

There are some elements to the Land Development Code changes that would impact all homeowners, including new homebuyers. While it is easy to say, the developers will pay for this, as anyone who has built a home knows, these costs just get passed on to home buyers.

One proposed change that could have unintended consequences for homeowners is under Goal 5, More strongly discourage non-permitted tree removal. This is proposed to take place with increased fines for non-permitted tree removal.

Increase Fine (Goal 5)

  • Current: LDC 4.01.05.E.3 provides a tiered approach to fines based on the size of the tree, with fines ranging from $200 to $1,000 per tree removed. If unable to assess the number and size of Protected trees removed due to the site being completely cleared and graded, such violation shall be subject to a fine of $30,000 per acre.
  • Proposed: Trees removed illegally should be subject to a fine 10X the current fine to discourage such violations.
  • Background: Ordinance 2020-23 amended the LDC to add Sec. 4.01.05.E.3 fines for Protected tree removal without a permit.
  • Cost: The current fine ranges from $200 to $1,000 per tree or $30,000 per acre. Therefore, the proposed fines would range from $2,000 to $10,000 per tree or $300,000 per acre.

While this may be intended to stop developers and builders from removing too many trees, the unintended consequence is that as a homeowner, you are subject to tohese same fines if you remove a protected tree without a permit.

If you are a homeowner, or plan to be a homeowner in St. Johns County, it is worth your time to read through the proposal and make your thoughts known to our County Commissioners.


Agenda Item 2 is a discussion on Residential Entitlements Data. What is that? We often hear that there in the neighborhood of 60,000 homes that are entitled to be built but have not been built, therefore no new homes need to be approved until the Infrastructure catches up. The Northeast Florida Builders Association (NEFBA) has long said that the number is not correct. This discussion item is to explore the differences in what NEFBA believes is remaining to be built and what the County database shows is remaining to be built.

There was an article about this in the Jacksonville Business Journal March 10. I think this link is behind a paywall, Builders Want Accurate Lot Count so I’ll summarize.

The article by Stuart Korfhage, who has long covered St. Johns County, begins with this statement, “When it comes to planning for growth in St. Johns County, there are two main camps: those who want a major slowdown and those who want a practical path forward.”

The divide between those two camps is evident on our Commission and in our communities as the county continues to evolve and grow.

The difference in numbers is large – NEFBA says the number is really around 25,000. As an example from the article, Sawgrass is showing a remaining 5,700 residential units to be built that are highly unlikely to be built.

At the March 4 Commission Meeting, Commissioner Murphy asked Growth Management to come back to the Board with more data on the actual count that they can use for future planning.

NEFBA Analysis of Residential Entitlements

Agenda Item 3 is the 2050 Comprehensive Plan Update: Data and Analysis. An update was provided on February 18 and the Commissioners had questions. This is a response to those questions. Information is here: Comp Plan Discussion


Agenda Item 4World Golf Village Hall of Fame Discussion. Another follow up item from a previous meeting, materials are here, but very high level. World Golf Hall of Fame


Agenda Item 5 – Hearing to vacate a portion of an unopened 16’ wide alley right-of-way in Hastings Villa, in Hastings.


Agenda Item 6 – Rivertown Forest Phase 1 – this is the platting of 152 single family lots on 65.261 acres.

Check out the details here: Rivertown Plat


Agenda Item 7Silverleaf Market Loop Road – final plat approval for Silverleaf Market Loop road – no residential lots.

Details here: Silverleaf Market


Agenda Item 8 – County Attorney Advisory Review Committee Recruitment Update – status update on selection of the County Attorney. Recommended candidates for the final section by the Board and details about the special meeting scheduled for March 25.

The Jax Daily Record reports on the 3 finalists here: County Attorney Recommendations

The finalists are, Rich Kommando (current interim attorney), Brad Bulthius (former assistant county attorney) and Michael Rodriguez (attorney in Boca Raton.)


Agenda Item 9Appointments to the Affordabe Housing Advisory Committee (AHAC) – Due to resignation and end of term for 2 members, 3 candidates are under consideration. CVs and recommendations here: AHAC Appointments


If you are finding value in these updates, please subscribe to my blog so you get notifications when I publish an update. Feel free to share with others who may find value in the content.

Posted in BOCC, St. Johns County

Florida Legislative Appropriations for St. Johns County

The Regular Session of the 2025 Florida Legislative Session opens March 4 so it’s time to start paying attention to bills important to St. Johns County!

Yes, there have been special sessions to address specific topics (i.e., Immigration) but the full regular session doesn’t open until March.

While there will be many bills to follow through the Legislative Session, one of the important items for St. Johns County residents is, what funding will we receive this year for local projects?

At the conclusion of session each year, we like to hear how much money our Legislative Delegation was able to secure for local projects. For example, in June of 2024, the County announced that for the 2025 fiscal year we had received $26.4 Million in state funding for 5 local projects. But, have you ever wondered how that happens?

I thought I’d share the process using a real life example of a project important to any of us who utilize the World Commerce Center corridor. Let’s follow it through!


Background

For St. Johns County, preparation for the session usually begins in December. That’s when the St. Johns County Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) meet to review and vote on the Legislative Priorities for the upcoming session.

These priorities come in from a variety of sources but ultimately are consolidated and presented to the Commissioner’s for a vote. The usual process in St. Johns County has County staff preparing a list of priorities and presenting to the Commissioners for their review and approval. That list is created from recommendations not just from county departments but from representatives of the community on various committees.

The Board of County Commissioners votes on the Priorities and the next step is to present to our Legislative Delegation when they meet in the County. Timing of the Delegation meeting varies. If Session is beginning in January (during election years) the Delegation meets in December. In 2025 Session begins in March so the Delegation meeting was scheduled for January.

This year the process for approving the County’s priorities worked a little differently. In an unusual move, at the first Board of County Commissioner’s meeting after the general election, newly appointed BOCC Chair Krista Joseph invited Representative Kim Kendall’s delegate, Tatum Wang, to read a letter from Representative Kendall with a recommendation for one of our Transportation Priorities.


Proposed Solution

During her campaign, Representative Kendall had promised a solution to the growing traffic issues at the I-95 and International Golf Parkway exchange. She worked hard to find a solution and her proposal was presented at the November 19 meeting by Ms. Wang along with a request to include this solution in the County’s Legislative Priorities for 2025 as part of the Top 5 Transportation Priorities

There was some discussion about how this may impact the existing top 5 Transportation Priorities for the County. In particular, Commissioner Whitehurst was concerned that we not do anything to impact currently approved and funded projects in the Top 5 by bumping with a project that is not yet funded. Ms. Wang countered that the project was already there, and just needed a change request. After some discussion about the confusion, the County Administrator confirmed that the project is NOT in the Top 5 priorities.

 After the confusing discussion about whether it was already in the priorities or not, consensus was reached have staff bring back more information in the Legislative Priorities discussion in December.

You can watch that discussion here: Initial Presentation


Legislative Priorities

Moving forward to the December Legislative Priorities discussion December 17, our County Director of Transportation, Dick D’Souza, presented the Transportation Priorities. He was joined by an FDOT representative who provided some context about the funding of projects. While there are funded projects that impacted International Golf Parkway, the interchange at I-95 was not on the list of funded projects.  He also clarified that normally Transportation Planning Organization (TPO) funding is not used for Interstate projects as there is other funding available for those type of projects. That created the opportunity for Representative Kendall to appear in person to present her proposal on the changes to the I-95 and International Golf Parkway interchange.

This was another unusual move on this project. We don’t normally see our Representatives involved in the Prioritization of items they will then be requesting on our behalf.

Representative Kendall’s proposal involves a change order to a $4 Million project to address the light at Buc-ee’s and replace it with a $40 Million dollar project to re-do the interchange. Her proposal involved obtaining Federal funding to support the project.

She had discussed this with Representative John Rutherford who advised this is typically an 80/20 split which translates into a Federal request for $32 Million and a State request for $8 Million. (Remember those numbers.)

Representative Kendall was asking the Commission for a “heavy lift” with a letter of support for this project and to shift the existing county transportation priorities to make this happen.

During commissioner’s discussion after presentation of the transportation priority list, it was made clear that the item must be on the top 5 priority list to be considered for the appropriations. Eventually it was added as item 6, that could be considered item 5.

The proposed change includes adding a new entry ramp from the east, for traffic headed south (a change from having to turn left onto the southbound ramp) and creating an extended exit ramp from the north, so traffic would cross IGP and turn onto World Commerce Parkway to access Buc-ee’s and Costco.

Proposal from Representative Kendall – author added highlights of new traffic pattern.

You can watch the presentation here: Priority Presentation


Legislative Delegation

On January 10, the Legislative Delegation for St. Johns County convened, and Chair Joseph formally presented the County priority list. Commissioner Taylor took the opportunity to address the specific request for the funding for I-95 and International Golf Parkway.

That started the ball rolling for Representative Kendall to file a request for the Appropriations of funding for the project.


Appropriations Process

There is a defined process for submitting an Appropriations request. All the steps can be found here: Florida House Appropriations Process

There are rules defined about how to submit, what can be submitted, and guidance on how to complete the forms. All appropriation requests for this session were to be submitted by 5:00 February 14 so we can now see all the submissions. You can search the list here: List of Submitted Appropriations Projects

These steps even include an Attestation by the Representative (under penalty of perjury) that all the information submitted is correct! A very thorough process!


But let’s keep following our I-95/IGP interchange project through the pipeline!

The County Government Affairs department works with our Legislative Delegation to prepare the request for appropriations.

Our County staff presented a request for $6 Million for a Fixed Capital Outlay.

The total cost of the project was noted as $40 Million with $6 Million coming from the State and $32 Million coming from Federal funds (an 80/15 split) and local funds of $2 Million. The $2 Million was noted that it was not guaranteed but that if state and federal funding were received, the county would provide $2 Million as a local match. (Remember Representative Kendall had talked about an 80/20 split of $32 Million Federal funding and $8 Million State funding.)

The County noted that the Construction/Renovation/Land/Planning Engineering costs for the project are $8 Million.

The request also noted that a study had not yet been done but that FDOT has directed funds to a study anticipated to start in the spring of 2025.

When we look at the Appropriations request submitted, we see there were some changes from what was submitted by the County.

The request for a Fixed Capital Outlay is now $3.5 Million, not $6 Million.

The Total Cost of the Project is the same, $40 Million but the request on file indicates that the split of funds is $34 Million from Federal funding and $3.5 Million from State funding (an 85/8.8 split) and an additional $500,000 from the State (not included in this appropriation.) The $2 Million from the County is indicated as Guaranteed in writing. The statement that the County would provide $2 Million in a local match if the Federal and State funding was received was not in the filed request.

The question of a study to confirm the need for the project is answered as “yes” with the caveat that funding for the study has been secured.

In the submitted request, the Construction/Renovation/Land/Planning Engineering costs for the project are $3.5 Million.

Reconciling the Differences

This table summarizes the financial changes to the submission

Line ItemCounty RequestSubmitted Request
Fixed Capital Outlay6,000,0003,500,000
Total Operations & Fixed Capital Outlay6,000,0003,500,000
Amount Requested from the State6,000,0003,500,000
Federal32,000,00034,000,000
State0500,000
Local2,000,0002,000,000
Total40,000,00040,000,000
Construction/Renovation/Land/Planning Engineering8,000,0003,500,000

Other changes in what was submitted:

  • Name of the lobbyist representing the County in this request was submitted as Joe Mobley but is presented in the request as Martin Florentino.
  • $2 Million from the County is noted as guaranteed in writing, not that it is contingent upon receipt of Federal and State funding.
  • Rather than confirming the study has not been completed, the submission checks the “yes” box for the study having been complete but in the explanation states that the study will be included in the future.

A check of the Federal Appropriations website indicates Congressman Rutherford has not yet submitted a request for this funding.

While it is ultimately the responsibility of the submitter to attest to the accuracy of what was submitted, there are several open questions about this funding request.

  • Why were the amounts changed?
  • Who provided the changed numbers?
  • Was anyone at the County involved in the changes prior to the submission?
  • Can the Construction/Renovation/Land/Planning Engineering be done for the reduced amount of 3.5 million rather than the 8 million requested?
  • Where is the additional $500,00 in state funding derived?
  • Has Congressman Rutherford been consulted and agreed to the new number for Federal Funding?
  • When will Congressman Rutherford be submitting a request for the Federal Funds?
  • What happens if the State funds are approved but the Federal Funds are not approved?
  • Is it accurate to say that the need for the funds has been documented by a 3rd party study, if the study hasn’t been concluded (or even started?)
  • Would the funds be in jeopardy if the study has not been completed?

We’ll keep following this important funding request through the process and keep you updated as we learn more!


If you are finding value in these updates, please subscribe to my blog so you get notifications when I publish an update. Feel free to share with others who may find value in the content.

Posted in BOCC, St. Johns County

Recap of the February 4 St. Johns County Board of County Commissioner’s Meeting

You never know what surprises will pop up at the St. Johns County BOCC meetings these days! And Tuesday did not disappoint!


The meeting began with a touching Proclamation Recognizing February 2025 as Teen Dating Violence Awareness Month. Such an important topic anywhere but in St. Johns County this was brought home even more so with the incident involving the young lady who accepted the proclamation. Madison Schemitz was a victim of a brutal attack by an ex-boyfriend in 2023. She still carries the scars of that attack but has dedicated herself to spreading awareness about healthy and unhealthy relationships.

Watch the presentation and hear from Madison at this link: Teen Dating Violence Awareness Presentation


Consent Agenda

Commissioner Murphy asked for Consent Agenda Item 17 to be brought forward to the Regular Agenda for discussion. This item became Agenda Item 1a.


Regular Agenda

Agenda Item 1 – Constitutional Officers Update

SJSO reminded the public that if they get a call asking to pay a fine with gift cards, they do not accept gift cards for payments. That is a scam. And he urged parents to pay attention to what websites their children are visiting. TPC is coming so folks in that area are reminded of the traffic congestion that occurs during TPC.

And don’t forget the Battle of the Badges, a fund raising event started by Sheriff Hardwick. This is a family friendly event to raise funds for the Diamond of Dreams in the south part of the county. Learn more about it and buy tickets here: Battle of the Badges Event

Property Appraiser’s update included information that taxable value on the tax rolls is up 10.4% for the year. With recent changes in state law, homesteaded property is increased at 3% or CPI, whichever is lower. CPI this year came in at 2.9% so homesteaded property assessed value will increase by 2.9%. Deadline to file for homestead exemptions is March 1.

You can file your homestead exemption on-line now at: Homestead Exemptions Site

The Court of the Clerk introduced the Interim Inspector General to present the 2025 Audit Plan. The Full Audit Plan can be found at this link: SJC Audit Plan

Editorial Comment: As a former Chief Audit Executive, I appreciate the time and effort put into these plans and the transparency with the information. Frequently I see residents who are not familiar with Audit Standards and international Professional Practices Framework (IPPF) opine about what was or was not included in the audit reports. There is no evidence that St. Johns County is not adhering to standard audit practices.


Agenda Item 1a turned into the first surprise of the day. This was Consent Agenda Item 17 that Commissioner Murphy asked to move to the Regular Agenda for discussion.

The background materials for this item are here: Consent Agenda Item 17

This item was just to approve extension of the Grant Agreement for the funds to build the Shore Drive Trail.

As a reminder, this trail was approved by the County Commissioners on March 5, 2024. There was a public announcement of the project and the much lauded intent to honor the legacy of the late Commissioner Paul Waldron with this trail.

Read the announcement here: Paul Waldron Trail Announcement

At the time it was approved, a survey had been performed and over 50% of the respondents had been in favor of the project.

Commissioner Murphy brought the item forward for discussion so the approval could be revisited. After more public comment and discussion, the approval to extend the grant agreement was denied. Because the grant was specifically to build the trail, those funds cannot be used to build a sidewalk in the area. This effectively killing the project that had been approved in March of 2024.

No Trail and No Sidewalk to address the safety issues voiced by the residents.


Agenda Item 2Non Residential Concurrency –  At the December 17, 2024 meeting, the Board directed staff to bring back an agenda item to consider the removal of the non-residential transportation concurrency exemption. Staff are returning with an ordinance and supplemental information for discussion and direction. This item will come back to the Board for a vote on adoption no sooner than February 18, 2025.”

Watch the discussion and presentation here: Agenda Item 2 Presentation

Residents may have seen a news report on First Coast News last week that included some erroneous statements about this Agenda item. Commissioner Whitehurst asked if anyone from the news station had reached out to anyone at the County to confirm details in the story and they had not. Commissioner Whitehurst then asked a clarifying question about the statement in the article that commercial development is not paying any impact fees. Mr. D’Souza confirmed that is an incorrect statement, “everybody pays impact fees.” Commercial development is being assessed impact fees and paying impact fees.

Questions were asked about Buc’ee’s, Costco, and Wal-Mart not being included in assessments and paying fees. It was clarified that these trip counts were included in the DRI assessment for World Commerce Center and therefore did pay concurrency fees. This ordinance change being requested ONLY applies to commercial businesses outside of a DRI.

A question was asked about what would trigger a 100 trip threshold – response was a 10,000 sq foot day care center or a 25,000 sq ft medical office, or a fast food restaurant with a drive-through.

Commissioner Murphy asked if there had been any commercial development since the ordinance change in 2018 that would have triggered the concurrency fee assessment, and the response was that there had not been anything that large come through since 2018.

Commissioner Murphy shared that he would only be supportive of this if it protected the smaller businesses because the big box stores have the deep pockets and are going to come regardless.

He also asked for and received clarification that concurrency fees are paid up front by the developer and then that amount is used as a credit to buy down their impact fees that are paid at the time of construction. What that means is this is essentially a passthrough for big businesses but may be a barrier for a smaller business just trying to open up.

This is a complicated topic as there are components in the Comprehensive Plan and components in the Land Development Code. It is easy to get them confused. I do suggest you watch the presentation to hear the explanations from Mr. D’Souza.

What was clear during public comment is that most residents don’t understand that the big box stores are coming into areas of Developments of Regional Impact (DRIs) and they ARE paying the concurrency fees. This ordinance change would not impact those at all. From statements made it appeared that they did not hear the explanation that the big box stores WERE included in the concurrency fee assessments paid by the DRIs when they were approved and that they HAD paid concurrency fees.

Certainly no one anticipated a Buc’ee’s gas station when World Commerce Center was approved, but the developer DID pay concurrency fees at the time. This ordinance would have no impact on that or on the incoming Wal-Mart that was recently permitted.

There is also confusion about this one time FEE vs recurring TAXES that are paid by commercial and how this impacts the county’s revenue.

The motion to transmit this ordinance failed 3:2 (Joseph, Taylor)

Disclosure: As Chair of the St. Johns County Public Policy Committee, I did assist in the presentation of the Chamber’s opposition to this change. Our concern was the impact on our small businesses in the county that would not have been protected in this specifica ordinance.

Difference between Prop Share and Impact Fees
Prop Share (Concurrency)
Impact Fees
Permitting History
Ordinance Change

Agenda item 3 – Morning Side Drive. appeal PVZVAR 2024-02 Approval – This is a repeal of a Ponte Vedra Zoning Board approval of an impervious surface ratio to accommodate a swimming pool.

The motion to uphold the zoning ruling passed unanimously.


Agenda Item 4 – Ponte Vedra lakes Boutique PUD -this was a request to incorporate a smaller piece of property into an existing PUD. Approved 5-0.

Agenda Item 5 – This is for a LAMP acquisition of property on Bishop Estates Road.

Highly ranked by the LAMP Board in 2024, there are 2 parcels that will be acquired by the County. The larger area is under consideration with the North Florida Land Trust to work with the Bailey family to perhaps run a horse therapy operation and to place some of the land in conservation.

Watch the presentation here: Bishop Road Estates Property Acquisition

Lots under discussion
Aerial view of all plats under discussion
Proposed Usage of lots
Potential Future Use

This was approved 5-0.


The County Board recessed and the St. Johns County Community Redevelopment Agency convened.

Agenda Item 6 – Interlocal Agreement between the St. Johns County Community Redevelopment Agency and Flagler Estates Road and Water Control District. This item is to use Tax Improvement Funds (TIF) to support road improvements in Flagler Estates.

While in session as the CRA, Commissioner Murphy requested and received consensus to direct staff to present a utility cost funding item to address lighting infrastructure costs.

They reconvened as the Board of County Commissioners.

This was approved 5-0


Agenda Item 7 – Appointment of a St. Johns County Municipality member to the Northeast Florida Regoinal Council (NEFRC). Virginia Morgan of St. Augustine Beach was approved to replace former St. Augustine City Commissioner Roxanne Horvath.


Commissioner Reports

Commissioner Whitehurst raised concerns from residents of Shearwater who are requesting a sound wall to protect them from the noise of the coming First Coast Expressway. Commissioner Murphy suggested that the North Florida TPO could conduct a sound study to aid in moving this concern forward. By consensus this will move forward.

He also reminded folks about the Mobile Mammogram that will be at the Admin Building on February 25th.

And, congratulations to the St. Johns Golf Club for awards received from the PGA of America. Check out the Press Release here: St. Johns County Golf Club Recognitions

Commissioner Arnold – a big thank you to Senator Tom Leek for filing a bill to select St. Johns County as the location for the Florida Museum of Black History. Press Release is here: Bill to Support the Black History Museum

Commissioner Taylor – The second big surprise of the day came in Commission Taylor’s comments. She raised a concern about an email that she had received from a member of staff with allegations about inappropriate workplace behavior that had been ignored. In a surprising move, Commissioner Taylor read from the email specifics of the complaint. She stated that the complaint was public record since it was emailed to her. She indicated that the correspondence alleged it had been escalated to County Administrator Andrews and that she had failed to respond.

I strongly urge you to watch the entire discussion here and not rely on 3rd party interpretation of what was said. Commissioner Taylor Comments and discussion

This is 2 meetings in a row that Commissioner’s comments include targeted complaints about the County Administrator.

Commissioner Taylor read from a document that had clearly been prepared earlier and asked for a vote to have an independent investigation. Commissioner Joseph joined in the discussion reading further from the email about the culture in the county. She also asked for consensus for a firm from outside the county to conduct an independent workplace investigator.

When Attorney Komando was asked if they could proceed with requesting an outside investigation, he took the opportunity to point out this email was most likely NOT public record as there exemptions that are in place to protect the employee from any type of disclosure. He informed the board that the county does have an outside firm that would handle these types of complaints.

Commissioner Arnold asked if they could get more information before making a decision as she hadn’t seen the email.

Commissioner Joseph suggested a 10 minute recess to allow everyone to read it as it is “in everybody’s junk mail.”

Commissioner Murphy asked if it was reported to HR and if HR had performed an investigation.

County Administrator Andrews advised that she would not comment on the specifics of the case out of respect for the parties involved but it had been addressed and proper actions had been taken with HR and legal counsel involved.

Commissioner Joseph pushed that the employee who wrote the email had not had a response in 5 months. Administrator Andrews advised that she would be happy to share the timeline but declined to hash it out in public.

Commissioner Joseph asked for consensus to have the outside investigator perform the work. Mr. Kommando advised that this is something that would be done anyway, they did not need the direction from the board.

As follow up to this discussion point, I requested a copy of the email, if it was indeed public record. I was advised by the County legal staff that it is NOT public record and is covered under Florida State Statute 119.071(2)(g)1, (k), and (n).

The statute is here: Florida State Statues Link with referenced sections copied below.

“(g)1. All complaints and other records in the custody of any agency which relate to a complaint of discrimination relating to race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, handicap, or marital status in connection with hiring practices, position classifications, salary, benefits, discipline, discharge, employee performance, evaluation, or other related activities are exempt from s. 119.07(1) and s. 24(a), Art. I of the State Constitution until a finding is made relating to probable cause, the investigation of the complaint becomes inactive, or the complaint or other record is made part of the official record of any hearing or court proceeding.”

“(k) A complaint of misconduct filed with an agency against an agency employee and all information obtained pursuant to an investigation by the agency of the complaint of misconduct is confidential and exempt from s. 119.07(1) and s. 24(a), Art. I of the State Constitution until the investigation ceases to be active, or until the agency provides written notice to the employee who is the subject of the complaint, either personally or by mail, that the agency has either:

1. Concluded the investigation with a finding not to proceed with disciplinary action or file charges; or

2. Concluded the investigation with a finding to proceed with disciplinary action or file charges.”

“(n) Personal identifying information of the alleged victim in an allegation of sexual harassment or the victim of sexual harassment is confidential and exempt from s. 119.07(1) and s. 24(a), Art. I of the State Constitution if such information identifies that person as an alleged victim or as a victim of sexual harassment. Confidentiality may be waived in writing by the alleged victim or the victim. Such information may be disclosed to another governmental entity in the furtherance of its official duties and responsibilities. This paragraph is subject to the Open Government Sunset Review Act in accordance with s. 119.15 and shall stand repealed on October 2, 2027, unless reviewed and saved from repeal through reenactment by the Legislature.”

In a subsequent news story, the reporter indicated that someone had anonymously leaked the email addressed to Commissioner Joseph to the press. Let us hope that the investigation identifies who leaked the email as they would be in violation of the referenced state statute referenced above.

Commissioner Murphy shared that beginning 2/10 portions of Watson Road West will be closed and shared about the community meetings to discuss the closures.

Commissioner Joseph applauded Roads and Bridges in their timely response to resident’s complaints about potholes. She also raised a concern about Sprinter vans and how the ordinance can be changed to address these being classified as Recreational Vehicles.

Update on the county Attorney Search

After the first 30 days, the committed felt their pool was not large enough so advertised for an additional 30 days. They will close the advertisement on February 21. Interviews will begin March 5th with consideration by the Board hopefully by March 18th.


If you are finding value in these updates, please subscribe to my blog so you get notifications when I publish an update. Feel free to share with others who may find value in the content.