Posted in BOCC, St. Johns County

Recap of the April 15, 2025 St. Johns County Board of County Commissioner’s Meeting

The meeting began and ended with important discussions that highlight the on-going discord with the current Board of County Commissioners. Residents have expressed their desire to see some of these disagreements put aside so the Commissioners can get on with the business of the County. Read on for more information.


Mental Health Awareness Month

Commissioner Sarah Arnold presented the Proclamation for Mental Health Awareness Month. Accepting the proclamation were representatives from families and organizations working with Mental Health issues in the community.

Watch the Proclamation presentation here: Mental Health Awareness Month

Learn more about two of the organizations at these links: Patients not Prisoners and SMA Healthcare

As someone who has seen first hand what mental health struggles can do to a family, I’m grateful for organizations like these and the Proclamation for Mental Health Awareness.


Public Safety Telecommunicators Week

The second proclamation of the day was for National Public Safety Telecommunicators Week. Appropriately presented by Commissioner Murphy, who began his law enforcement career in this field, this proclamation recognizes the work done by the dedicated folks who answer the call to 911, handling over 414,000 incoming and outgoing calls in St. Johns County last year.

You can watch the presentation here: Public Safety Telecommunicators Week

There were no additions or deletions to the Consent Agenda and it was approved.


Regular Agenda

Regular Agenda Item 1 – Request for Reimbursement of Attorney’s Fees.

Commissioner Joseph is requesting reimbursement of her attorney fees incurred when she filed suit against the Florida State’s Attorney and the County Commissioners. See the slides for more details on the events.

Screenshot

Following her attorney’s presentation, Commissioner Joseph asked if she was ever going to be put in jail. The attorney responded that at one point there were law enforcement vehicles outside her home in early morning hours and that caused her to worry that there would be a predawn raid. The attorney contacted the State’s Attorney’s office to discuss arranging a surrender for her arrest so that her husband would not be left without care. The State’s Attorney would not have the discussion.

Commissioner Taylor made a motion to move funds from the General Reserve fund and approve the amount of $139,005 in attorney’s fees for Commissioner Joseph. Commissioner Joseph seconded the motion.

After public comment, there were questions from the other Commissioners. Some of the questions and answers are paraphrased here:

Q – Has Commissioner Joseph paid this bill?

Answer – No, she still owes the attorney so the request is for the county taxpayers to pay the attorney’s fees for Commissioner Joseph

Q – What gave Commissioner Joseph the impression that there was going to be a pre-dawn raid?

Answer – There were law enforcement cards idling outside her house in the pre-dawn hours an that gave her concern. There was never any verification about why the law enforcement cars were outside of her home and never an arrest. She did believe they were there at the direction of the State’s Attorney’s Office.

Q – Why is Commissioner Joseph pursuing the County to reimburse her rather than the State’s Attorney’s Office which was pursuing the prosecution after the County Commissioners were dismissed from the lawsuit.

Answer – She is seeking reimbursement because these were fees incurred as part of her public duty.

Commissioner Murphy noted during discussions that the taxpayer is getting the bill both ways – to defend the Commissioners and to reimburse Commissioner Joseph for her fees.

Commissioner Murphy questioned the amount being requested and referred to an amount of $110,242 that had been deemed to be a “reasonable fee” and said he would support an amended motion for that amount. He would not support the total requested without an itemized bill for that amount.

Commissioner Arnold also asked about itemized bills and questioned the request being a reimbursement when the bill has not yet been paid. She would like for the topic to come back with more information in the request.

Commisioner Taylor amended her motion to $110,000, it was seconded by Commissioner Murphy and passed 3-2 with Arnold and Whitehurst being the No votes.

You can watch the presentation here: Agenda Item 1 – Reimbursement of Legal Fees


Agenda item 2The Shell at St. Augustine -a project to benefit local arts, culture and heritage organizations, provide a pathway to sustainability for the participating non-profits, increase tourism dollars for St. Johns County and enrich quality of life for local residents.

The organization has funding to build the building and are looking for a location to build. Consensus from the Board was for staff to work with the organization to help finding a location for this facility.

Organizations in the Alliance
Rendering of proposed facility
Desired Location

Watch the presentation here: The Shell


Agenda item 3Dog and Bog withdrawal of request. The applicants have determined they cannot develop the project and have located a local partner, Habitat for Humanity of St. Johns County, who are in discussions to purchase the project. Habitat for Humanity CEO Malinda Everson confirmed that Habitat is in the due diligence phase of moving forward with the purchase.

(Disclosure: I currently serve as the Treasurer on the Habitat for Humanity Board and did vote affirmatively to move forward with this purchase, dependent upon the outcome of the due diligence.)


Agenda Item 5 – change order to Phase 1 Design-Build Agreement for Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for Design-Build services for Silverleaf Fire Station #22 and Sheriff’s Operations Center. This was an item to process a change order to include Early Works in the project at a cost of $2,288,800. Approved unanimously

project scope

Agenda Item 6Amendment for Early Works packages for Central Community and Community Sportsplex Parks. Approved unanimously

Agenda Items 7– Appointment to the Housing Finance Authority. Robin Pfalzgraf was appointed unanimously.

Agenda Item 8County Attorney Agreement for Legal Services.

After discussion on the agreement and minor modifications, it was approved 3-2 (Taylor and Joseph being no votes.)

Once approved, Commissioner Joseph expressed her concern about signing the contract without confirmation that there would be no criminal repercussions. Attorney Kommando indicated there was no reason he knows of that she could not sign the agreement but if she were uncomfortable, she could delegate to someone else. She stated that is what she would do.

The agreement can be found here: County Attorney’s Legal Agreement

You can watch the video here: Discussion on County Attorney Agreement


Commissioner’s reports

Commissioner Whitehurst – Congratulations to the Gators on recent athletic wins. Very impressed with his tour of Saint Augustine Youth Services (SAYS) and recommended all commissioners should take that tour. Learn more about SAYS here: SAYS Website

Commissioner Whitehurst also shared a recap of his recent visits to Tallahassee and all the legislators he met with while in Tallahassee pursuing actions and funding on behalf of St. Johns County.

And concluded with Happy Easter to all those who celebrate

Commissioner Arnold – Also shared an update on the visits to Tallahassee. Taking off her Commissioner hat for a moment, she spoke about bills moving through the House and Senate right now that could potentially result in loss of funding to special programs in St. Johns County included IP, AP, AICE, CTE and Dual Enrollment programs. She encouraged all parents to do their own research, come to their own conclusions and reach out to the legislators if they are so inclined.

Commission Taylor – Shared an update on her visits to Tallahassee. She asked for clarification about the bill related to funding for the IGP and I-95 interchange. Senator Leek had pointed out that this item was number 6 on the priority list and she wanted clarification to Senator Leek that it is one the County’s Top priorities. She talked about a letter requesting the funding and wanted to include in the letter that the county is requesting $10 Million dollars in federal funding.

See previous post about the requested appropriations for IGP and I-95 improvements here: Florida Legislative Appropriations Process Blog

Commissioner Murphy – Shared he was wearing his Autism Awareness hat he got while attending a recent Re-Certification class with Old Town Trolley Tours.

He asked for consensus to direct staff to review some standing committees that have been inactive for some time. This will come back to the Board as an Agenda item.

He also talked about the trips to Tallahassee and the importance of the Commissioners going to Tallahassee and developing relationships that will allow them to bring home more money from Tallahassee. In order to meet the goal of a tax rollback, the county must have money from Tallahassee.

Commissioner Joseph raised a point that when they were in Tallahassee, Commissioners Arnold and Whitehurst were meeting with the legislators separately from Commissioners Joseph, Murphy, and Taylor. This devolved into a bit of a debate between Commissioners Joseph and Whitehurst that is worth watching at the link below.

Commissioner Joseph asked about updating the letter to Senator Leek about funding for the IGP-I-95 exchange. County Administrator Andrews explained that there are very careful discussions with Congressman Rutherford’s office about what that number might be and they do not want to submit a number that has not been agreed to by his office. (Again reference the process outlined in the link to a previous blog post above.)

Commissioner Joseph also sent Happy Anniversary wishes to her husband on their 35th Anniversary on April 16.

Watch the Reports here for more context and detail: Commissioner’s Reports


County Administrator’s Report

Administrator Andrews expressed appreciation to the Board for Rich Kommando’s contract and expressed that this is the most impressive legal team they have had at the county during her tenure. She also had the Director of Growth Management Mike Roberson provide an update on the Comprehensive Plan timeline.

Administrator Andrews provided an update on the situation with Indianhead Biomass. A letter was issued to the business with code violations. The county is working with them to address the violations. She shared that the company does provide a valuable service to the county as they are the only vendor who addresses our biomass collection. They are still awaiting results of a study to determine if the odor violates current standards but are also talking with the company to bring down the odors.


County Attorney’s Report

Attorney Kommando pointed out to the Board that there are more than Appropriations of concern in Tallahassee this session including bills concerning condo associations and local preemptions. Deputy Attorney Kealey West thanked the Board for the decision about Attorney Kommando, commenting that he has been here for a year, guiding through a tumultuous time and they office looks forward to his continued leadership.


If you are finding value in these updates, please subscribe to my blog so you get notifications when I publish an update. Feel free to share with others who may find value in the content.

Posted in BOCC, Comprehensive Plan

What’s Ahead at the June 4, 2024 St. Johns county Board of County Commissioner’s Meeting

There are no proclamations for this meeting.


Consent Agenda

Consent Agenda Item 5 – LAMP purchase recommendations seem to be hot topics recently and this is one for the purchase of 6.8 acres of land in Elkton.

Check out the details here: Consent Agenda Item 5

Consent Agenda Item 8 – modifying land use to add a library to the permitted uses of the Northeast Regional Park in Nocatee.

Details are here: Consent Agenda Item 8


Regular Agenda

Agenda Item 1 is the presentation of the budges for the Constitutional Officers; St. Johns County Sheriff, Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroller, and the Property Appraiser.

The link is here: Constitutional Officers Budgets

Highlights:

The Sheriff is requesting a budget of $128,702,884 for the 2025 year.

The Clerk of the Court is requesting a budget of $4,477,646.


Agenda Item 2 is Presentation of the Annual Reports of Boards and Committees. This includes reports from the 20 boards appointed by the BOCC.

Presentation is here: Boards and Committees Annual Reports


Agenda Item 3 is the Pavo Economic Incentive request continued from the May 21 BOCC meeting because the applicant was not present.

The application is for incentives to develop a total of 22,680 Sq. Ft of speculative industrial/office space (no known tenant) near the intersection of I-95 an dInternational Golf Parkway.  They are seeking incentives of $107,224 with anticipated net benefit to the county of 387,933.

Location of Pavo Project

The full report is here: Economic Incentive Request


Agenda Item 4 is the Adoption Hearing for updates to the Comprehensive Plan to bring it into compliance with Florida statutes (HB 1379) passed in 2023. The transmittal was approved at the BCC on April 16, 2024.

Full details are at this link:  Comp Plan Update


Agenda Item 5 is a petition to add 102.96 acres to the current ~437 acre Entrada CDD.

Details are here: Entrada CDD Expansion


Agenda Item 6 is a request to rezone 1.52 acres of land from Residential, Single Family to Industrial Warehousing for the purpose of building a 189,320 Sq. Ft RV & Boat Storage Facility. This parcel is located at the intersection of Avenue D and 1st Street, west of US 1.

Location of proposed RV/Boat Storage

Details are here:  Details of RV Boat Storage request


Agenda Items 7 and 8 are interesting because this seeks to provide what may be the first Charter School in St. Johns County.

The request is to remove 5 acres of land from the Treaty Grounds Planned Unit Development and to rezone those 5 acres to Open Rural to allow for a K-8 Charter School and Early Learning Cetner at 1600 Brinkhoff Road (near SR 207.)

Details are here: Agenda Item 7 and Agenda Item 8


If you are finding value in these updates, please subscribe to my blog so you get notifications when I publish an update. Feel free to share with others who may find value in the content.

Posted in St. Johns County

What’s Coming up at the November 7 St. Johns County Board of County Commissioner’s Meeting

All regular County Commissioner meetings are the first and third Tuesdays of the Month in the County Auditorium at 500 San Sebastian View.

One highly anticipated item is on the agenda – the Ponte Vedra Resort PUD!


There are 3 Proclamations and one Certificate of Recognition to be presented at Tuesday’s Meeting.

  • Proclamation Recognizing November 11, 2023 as Veteran’s Day
  • Proclamation Recognizing November 2023 as National Adoption Month
  • Proclamation Recognizing November 15 – 17, 2023 as Entrepreneurship Week at the Link
  • Certificate of Recognition for 10 Years of West Augustine’s participation in Keep Calm and Walk for Cancer

Public Comment is at Time Certain of 11:30. This continues to cause some confusion as other presentations may be interrupted to allow for the Time Certain Public Comment. Remember to stick around and they will resume interrupted presentations after Time Certain Public Comment.

There is another Time Certain Agenda item on the November 7 Agenda and that is the Ponte Vedra Resort PUD. This will be heard at a Time Certain of 1:00.


Consent Agenda Items

There are 40 items on the Consent Agenda Several of the items are minor, related to easements for utilities.

Some items of note:

Consent Agenda Items 3 & 4

Granting a 10 year historic property partial ad valorem tax exemption for 301 North Main Street, and 316 North Main Street, Hastings, beginning January 1, 2024 and expiring December 31, 2034. Details are here: 301 North Main Street

Background:

“St. Johns County Ordinance No. 2022-55, St. Johns County Historic Preservation Property Tax Exemption Ordinance, applies county-wide and establishes procedures for application to and review by the Cultural Resource Review Board (CRRB) for private properties seeking a property tax exemption for improvements to historic preservation in accordance with Florida Statutes. This preservation incentive contributes to stimulating business investment for commercial projects and higher property value retention for residential neighborhoods. The application submitted to the County was approved by the CRRB on June 12, 2023. The historic ad valorem tax exemption application is now before the Board of County Commissioners to approve or deny the tax exemption beginning January 1, 2024 for a period of ten (10) years and for permission to enter into a covenant with the property owner as required by Florida Statutes.”

301 North Main Street

This structure was previously known as the Stanton Motors Building and has been in existence since 1927. At the time, this was the oldest family-owned Ford dealership in Florida. The structure was determined to be a Significant Cultural Resource by the Cultural Resource Review Board in June of 2022. As part of the revitalization of Historic Main Street Hastings, this building as had extensive rehabilitation including restoration of interior and exterior deterioration, roof repair, and removal of accumulated debris.

The amount of the exemption is to be determined by the Property Appraisor.

Follow the link above to see historic pictures of the building.

316 North Main Street

There are two structures located at 316 N Main Street. The main structure was known as the “Big Brick Garage” while the second structure was used as the print shop for the Hastings Herald. These structures were determined to be Significant Cultural Resources by the Cultural Resource Review Board (CRRB) in August of 2022. The rehabilitation of the structures located at 316 N Main Street included repair of fire damage, vandalism, and restoration of interior and exterior deterioration.

Pictures of this building can be seen in the presentation at this link: 316 North Main Street


Consent Agenda Item 5

This is a School Concurrency agreement for the Browning Subdivision that was approved by the School Board in the October 10, 2023 School Board Meeting.

Link to the Concurrency Agreement here: Browning Concurrency Agreement

NOTE: Concurrency agreements were discussed in the Joint Meeting of the School Board and the Board of County Commissioners. If the School Board has approved the Concurrency Agreement, the development process continues forward to the Board of County Commissioners for approval. If the School Board votes NO, and does not approve the Concurrency Agreement, the developer cannot continue forward in the process.  They must either wait for capacity to be available or continue working with the School Board to gain approval of Concurrency. The Board of County Commissioners cannot consider the school conditions as part of their review process if the School Board has approved the Concurrency.


Consent Agenda Item 27 is awarding a bid for the construction of the CR 2209 Extension Central Segment. This segment is a four-lane from Silverleaf Drive to State Road 16 and includes a twelve-foot multi-use path, five foot sidewalks, and a stormwater pond.

The back-up materials are at this link: CR 2209 Construction


Regular Agenda Items

Item 1 is a presentation of Total Earned Unused and Undistributed Revenue. No presentation on-line as of Friday.

Item 2

Approval and Recognition of FIND Grant Project Agreement for Genovar Land Acquisition

“On February 7, 2023, the Board approved the submission of a Florida Inland Navigation District (FIND) grant application for reimbursement of Genovar land acquisition costs. FIND awarded a $1,055,500 grant for acquisition of the 31 acres of Genovar property located North of SR 312 and South of Nix Boat Yard and situated along the San Sebastian River with deep water access for a public boat ramp, parking, and passive recreation. Parks and Recreation is requesting authorization to sign FIND Project Agreement #SJ-23-217 for Genovar Land Acquisition.”

Background materials are here: Genovar Land Acquisition


Item 3 – REZ 2023-10 135 Nix Boat Yard

Link to materials: Nix Boat Yard

“Request to Rezone approximately 0.59 acres of land from Open Rural (OR) to Commercial Warehouse (CW) with conditions, specifically located at 135 Nix Boat Yard Road. The Planning and Zoning Agency heard this request at their regularly scheduled public hearing on October 5, 2023, and recommended approval with a vote of 5-0. Agency members discussed the previous daycare facility and when it relocated. There was one public comment that questioned the buffering, traffic, parking and proposed clientele. In response, the applicant discussed a proposed 20/B buffer; since the PZA hearing, the applicant has included an additional condition to the Rezoning that states a 20/B buffer will be installed and maintained on the west side of the property adjacent to the existing Commercial Office.”

Application Summary:

“The Applicant is seeking to rezone approximately 0.59 acres of land from Open Rural (OR) to Commercial, Warehouse (CW) with conditions. The applicant’s narrative states the recent use of the property was a Daycare Center and points out that the surrounding properties are commercial. The narrative states that the request for a Commercial Warehouse zoning would allow a local business to further grow; the new owner of the property is Fishbites Trading LLLP which manufactures and distributes artificial baits worldwide. The applicant provides the following conditions to the zoning: • Uses are limited to light manufacturing, production, packaging and shipping, and associated office space and showroom • All uses shall be fully enclosed inside buildings with no outdoor storage • Loading zones shall be permitted • The applicant waives any right to develop the property pursuant to the Live Local Act, Chapter 2023- 17 Laws of Florida, and any subsequent amendment • ADDED since PZA 10/05/2023: The applicant will install and maintain a 20/B buffer on the west side of the property adjacent to the existing Commercial Office.”

More details in my post on the October 5 PZA Meeting: October 5 PZA Agenda Blog


Item 5 is the First Reading of Proposed Amendments to the St. Johns County Beach Code.

Link to materials here: 1st Reading of Updated Beach Codes

This came about as a result of a request from Commissioner Alaimo at the October 3, 2023 Board of County Commissioner’s Meeting.

The specific changes related to the use of electric bikes, drones, and motor vehicles on St. Johns County beaches.

Section 3.14 – Aircraft

No one operating, directing or responsible for any aircraft, seaplane, helicopter, glider, balloon, dirigible, parachute, drone or other aerial apparatus shall take off from or land within park property or the beach.

Section 3.15 – Electric Motorized Devices

It shall be unlawful for any person to:

  • Operate any e-bike, e-scooter, or other electric motorized device in a careless manner. Careless operation of an e-bike, e-scooter, or other electric motorized device shall include but is not limited to:

1. Operation of an e-bike, e-scooter, or other electric motorized devices with another person on the handlebars or in any position in front of the operator;

2. Operation of e-bike, e-scooter, or other electric motorized devices at a speed greater than is reasonable and prudent under the conditions, having regarded to the actual and potential hazards then existing, including but not limited to, the safety of the operator or any other person or property;

3. Failing to yield to pedestrians;

4. Weaving in and out of pedestrians traffic or stationary beachgoers;

5. Operation of e-bike with more riders, operators, or passengers than for which it was designed; or

6. Any occurrence where inadvertence to the safe and normal operational procedures of the e-bike, e-scooter, or other electric motorized devices causes or is likely to cause damage to any person or property.

All operators shall at all times yield the right-of-way to pedestrians and shall take such precautions as may be necessary before parking, or before moving a vehicle previously parked, to avoid accident or collisions with or injury to any persons or property.

Section 5 Traffic and Parking Regulations

Section 5.03 Prohibited Acts

(k) Operate any motor vehicle so as to intentionally cause sand to be thrown into the air or across any beach area.


Agenda Items 6 and 7 are consideration of appointments to the Contractors Review Board and the Cultural Resources Review Board.


Item 7 is the Time Certain 1:00 Hearing of the Ponte Vedra Resort PUD.

This item has been hotly debated across in the press, in public meetings, and on social media.

“Request to rezone approximately 90.5 acres of land from Open Rural (OR), Single Family Residential District (R-1-B), Single Family Residential District (R-1-C), Multiple Family Residential District (R2), Commercial District (R-3), and Recreational District (R-4) to Planned Unit Development (PUD), to allow the redevelopment of resort lodging, restaurant, recreational, commercial, and office facilities within the Ponte Vedra Inn & Club and the Lodge Property.”

Link to materials is here: Ponte Vedra Resort PUD


If you are finding value in these updates, please subscribe to my blog so you get notifications when I publish an update. Feel free to share with others who may find value in the content.

Posted in BOCC, St Johns County Schools, St. Johns County

Recap of the Joint Meeting of the St. Johns County School Board and the Board of County Commissioners

Yesterday was a rare occurrence, a joint meeting of the 2 Board that have the future of our County in their hands.

The live audience was sparse, with more School District and County employees on hand than general public. This may be because of short notice and little publicity about the meeting.


The meeting opened with a surprise guest invited by Commissioner Chair, Christian Whitehurst.

Commissioner Whitehurst had met with Senator Travis Hutson last week and discussed some of the items on the agenda for the joint meeting. He invited Senator Hutson to speak to the group. As he introduced Senator Hutson, he pointed out that the school concerns are a “three-legged stool” with the School District, the County, and the delegation in Tallahassee providing solutions.

Senator Hutson shared that he had already begun some work on deregulation around education. He noted that St. Johns County has always been a high growth county, since he was elected to the House, working with Senator Thrasher at the time, they brought millions of dollars back to the county for education. He shared that the money that can be brought back to the county is based on a mathematical formula based on the needs and performance of the county.

Last year the total funds that could be used were about $40 million in total and 3 or 4 other counties made that list, with St. Johns County falling to be bottom of that list. Out of that dollar amount, St. Johns County only got about $1 million based on needs, compared to the other counties on the list.

He noted this is a statewide issue. There are policies on the books that have “hamstrung” the school districts with the bureaucracy. Example is that you have to build schools to hurricane standards now. This is requiring schools to be built to higher standards than necessary and that increases the cost. Not all schools need to be built that way – changing this formula could allow funds to be used for additional schools, not hardening schools.

There are also limits on how specific dollars can be spent for specific uses. That means dollars are tied to very specific uses – they can’t be used for other uses.

In the next couple of weeks, they will be launching a series of deregulation bills (for education) and will be working directly with the school board and others to refine those bills. Senator Hutson’s bills will be specifically about construction and the physical impact. He has a draft, but it is not ready for prime time.

During comments from the dais for Senator Hutson, School Board Member Canan mentioned the frustrations about money for the teachers as well as some of the mandates that are placed on teachers by Tallahassee.

Commissioner Dean took the time to point out that many of the homes that are being built today were actually approved long before the existing School Board and County Commissioners were on the boards.; 80% of the homes constructed since 2016 were approved during the process between 2000 and 2008. Roughly 40,000 homes remain to be built that were approved prior to 2008.

You can watch Senator Hutson’s comments and the following discussion at this link: Senator Travis Hutson Remarks


Overview of the School Construction Funding Process

Next up was School Superintendent Tim Forson and a presentation on how new schools are funded.

Mr. Forson talked about the complexity of funding sources for building new schools.

There are 2 silos of budget funds, Operating Funds and Capital Funding. The two funds cannot be intermingled or used for other purposes. Operating Funds are more Human Resources focused, daily operations of the schools. Capital Funding is for buildings.

He shared that when the county was building schools in 2006, 2007, and 2008, there were significant state dollars that were used with local dollars to build the schools. That state funding is now gone.

Today, new construction of schools falls on the local communities. State sources and PECO (Public Education Capital Outlay) funding no longer exists. That is not because the state is not allocating the funds; it is because the funding sources have dried up.

NOTE: PECO funding comes from the state gross receipts tax from the sale of electricity, gas, and communications services (cable, cell phones, and land lines). As these tax receipts have decreased, so has funding for PECO.

There is no state source that will help build schools in today’s environment.  

Commissioner Dean asked about the money from the Florida Lottery that is supposed to fund education. The lottery money is largely for Bright Futures, not K-12 education.

Looking at Local Sources, there are 4 primary sources:

  • Local Discretionary Capital Outlay Millage (was 2.0, is now 1.5 mills)
  • School Impact Fees
  • School Concurrency Proportionate Share Mitigation Payments
  • Half-Cent Sales Surtax

Capital Outlay millage can ONLY be spent on capital projects.

Impact fees are tiered based on the value of the home – timing is an issue.

School Proportionate Share Mitigation are based on a formula that is applied to a new construction project.

The Half-Cent surtax can only be spent on the four designated categories:

  • Meeting the Needs of an Increasing Student Population
  • Maintain High Quality Educational Facilities
  • Provide New Technology to Prepare Children for 21st Century Learning
  • Continue to Keep Children Safe

Timing of the sources:

The Millage is property tax – the school district doesn’t see that until the first time a property owner pays their property taxes. They money has to accumulate over time to fund new construction. Timeline is about 18 months before the district sees that money.

School Impact fees – paid by the homeowner when the new home is closed on.

School Concurrency fees – Mitigation fees. When a large project is phased, the proportionate share is paid when they are ready to move forward on a project. This is money that the school district gets in advance.

Sales Tax – purely economically driven

Why don’t more of these funding sources come earlier? It is taxpayer dollars and you can’t get too far ahead of the funding sources.

Not every county has Impact Fees and not every county does the work on the Proportionate Share funds. This is because not every county has capacity issues.

Not every county has the additional sales tax revenue for funding.

Observation was made that Florida’s funding of schools is not the same as other states and that can be confusing for parents coming from other states. The tax structures are so different as well as how schools are funded.

Commissioner Dean raised a question about the common belief that new schools cannot be built until the schools are at least 50% over capacity.

Answer? Statutes have changed over the years, since Mr. Forson has been involved since 2006, they have never been held from building a school because of a capacity number issue. They create a 5 year work plan, develop that workplan, and it’s approved. What stands in the way is the flow of dollars, not the state saying yes, you can build or no you can’t build.

You do need to build new schools at a size to operate in the black – there must be enough funding based on numbers of students to operate in the black.

The bonding capacity IS regulated by the state so the reduction in Millage from 2 to 1.5 did have an impact. They must complete a project before they can issue more bonds.

NOTE! School Board members have been perpetuating this urban legend – refer them back to this presentation the next time you hear it!

Commissioner Joseph asked if the School Board wanted more input into the approval of new homes.

Mr. Forson pointed out there are some legal considerations into how that happens. There are statutory and local requirements and mandates that drive the process. He did point out, they are at the table. The School Board does see the project and approves the mitigation portion before it goes to the Board of Commissioners.

School Board Member Mr. Canan wanted to refer the audience to the sales tax portion of the funding and underscore its importance. This was voted on and put in place at a time when school funds were drying up and there was no money for new schools. He asked Mr. Forson what the sales tax had funded.

Response:

  • 2 new schools
  • 2 partial schools that would probably have been only 1 school
  • 1 school expansion
  • 5,655 student stations have been built as a result of sales tax

The district would probably have about 4000 fewer seats in the system.

Mr. Forson indicated that In 10 years, the district has grown by 13,467 students to 52,000 students. Doing some fact checking, numbers in 2012 were 32,187 and numbers today are at ~52,000.

During that time, they have built 9 new schools, 3 expansions, and 3 are under construction now.

40% of that construction was based on sales tax funding.

There was further discussion about communication between the School Board and the County Commissioner’s regarding approval of new developments. Both School Board representatives and County representatives emphasized there is communication, and the School Board is engaged and aware of all new developments. They determine the proportionate fair share the developers pay and that is approved by the School Board before the Commissioners make their determination.

You can watch Mr. Forson’s presentation here: Superintendent Forson’s Presentation


Presentation of school-related infrastructure projects

Colin Groff Interim Deputy County Administrator presented on the Infrastructure projects.

He began the discussion with an explanation about the concurrency and proportionate share process.

When a developer brings forward a project, before anyone on the Board of Commissioners sees it for approval, that project has gone through the School Board and they have looked at the concurrency and said, “yes we have the capacity.” If they do not sign off on the project, it stops right there and does not move forward until the capacity deficit is addressed.

If the capacity is not there, the developer may choose to pause, or to pay the proportionate share agreement that is approved by the School Board for the developer to fund their portion of future schools.

Important to note that the process stops and the project does not move forward to the County Commissioners for review unless there is capacity or an agreement to fund future capacity. The School Board does play a role in that process.


Capital Project Updates

Dr. Asplen presented on the current school projects. He answered a question about a new High School with a projected date of around 2027 – 2028.


Colin Groff presented on the school related Infrastructure Projects


Adam Teckler, Legislative Affairs Manager, presented some next steps.

State Board of Education Report is due by November 1

Purpose is to reduce unnecessary regulation on public schools. Expected to review cost per student station formula and options for high growth school districts. May also address student transportation.


After a brief recess, they heard Public Comment.

Public comments were shared about:

  • Teacher pay
  • Appreciation for this meeting and hope for continued joint meetings
  • Don’t forget the older communities and their school needs
  • Need for more middle schools and high schools

You can watch the entire presentation at this link: https://stjohnscountyfl.new.swagit.com/videos/277579


If you are finding value in these updates, please subscribe to my blog so you get notifications when I publish an update. Feel free to share with others who may find value in the content.

Posted in BOCC, St. Johns County

Summary of the September 5 St. Johns County Board of County Commissioner’s Meeting (Part 1)

Board of County Commissioner Meetings are the first and third Tuesdays of the Month, 9:00 AM, at the County Auditorium, 500 San Sebastian View.

Image from St. Johns County Facebook Page

My update on last week’s meetings has been delayed as I have been traveling. Thanks for your patience!

Beause of the length of the meeting and importance of some of the topics, I will be posting the September 5 summary in two parts.


Link to the full agenda is here: BOCC Agenda 9-5-23

Commissioner Arnold participated in the meeting remotely.

There were 3 Proclamations presented at the September 5 BOCC meeting.

  • Hispanic Heritage Month
  • Constitution Week
  • Library Card Sign-up Month

During the Constitution Week Presentation it was noted there will be a special presentation for Constitution Week on September 17 at the Plaza in downtown St. Augustine. Commissioner Whitehurst will be one of the speakers and they will have all the bells in the downtown churches ringing for 2 minutes in recognition of the signing of the Constitution. All are invited to attend.

At the conclusion of the Library Card Sign-Up Month presentation, Commissioners who did not already have a card were presented with their own Library Card and challenged to use them!


Public Safety Update

Two SJSO Dispatchers were sent to Taylor County to help with hurricane recovery and have returned.

The Fire Chief reported that while Hurricane Idalia was minimal impact for the county, it did provide an opportunity for the teams to go through the exercise with a lot of new faes in the team. That was a success. Two fire personnel were sent to Citrus County to assist with hurricane recovery. 

Clerk of the Court’s Report

Brandon Patty shared that one of the responsibilities under the Clerk fo the Court is the Value Adjustment Board. If a property owner objects to the Property Appraiser’s valuation of their property, they can file a petition that will be managed by the Value Adjustment Board. Here is a link to the Petition filing Process: Value Adjustment Board Petition

To honor Consitution Day, residents can pick up a free copy of the Constitution at the County Court House anytime during the month of September.


County Infrastructure Report

A new item on the Commissioner’s Agenda is the County Infrastructure Report. The Infrastructure team will provide updates on on-going capital projects

Graphic provided by the Infrastructure Team

Consent Agenda Items of interest

I requested that the 2 items on the Consent Agenda related to The Landings development in Greenbriar be moved to the Regular Agenda. Commissioner Joseph concurred with that request and the Commissioners agreed to move them to be voted on with the Regular Agenda items 1 – 4.

Here are the 2 Agenda items.

Consent Agenda Item 3 is the School Concurrency Proportionate Share Mitigation Agreement and Consent Agenda Item 4 is the Proportionate Fair Share Agreement. What is most interesting is that the Comprehensive Plan Amendments (CPA) and the Planned Unit Development (PUD) agreement for both The Landings at Greenbriar and The Landings at St. Johns are on the Regular Agenda for Sept. 5. This means that the Consent Agenda items could technically be approved before the CPA and PUD are even heard by the Commissioners at the September 5 meeting.

Consent Agenda Item 3 is the School Concurrency Proportionate Share Mitigation Agreement is an agreement that to mitigate for the lack of school capacity today, the proportionate share is $9,563,320 or $16,264 per dwelling unit. This will be satisfied by dedication of an off-site drainage easement to serve the existing elementary school site adjacent the proposed PUD. This is valued at $321,481. The balance of $9,241,845 will be a payment made prior to Construction Plan approval. The School Impact fee credits will be for the full amount of the $9,563,320. This was approved by the School Board on July 11, 2023.

Importantly, the School Distrct will apply this Proportionate Share Mitigation towards school capacity improvements to be added to the planned capital improvements in the next update of the Five Year District Facilities Work Plan.

Read the details here: Consent Agenda Item 3

Consent Agenda Item 4 is the Proportionate Fair Share Agreement to mitigate the transportation impacts to CR 210, Greenbriar Road, SR 13 and Longleaf Pine Parkway. The  proportionate fair share (PFS) for this project (The Landings at Greenbriar and St. Johns) is calculated to be $8,148,710.00. This would fund widening a portion of Greenbriar Road from a point just east of the Greenbriar Rd/Longleaf Pine Pkwy intersection to approximately nine-tenths (0.9) of a mile west of the intersection from 2 to 4 lanes, including improvements to the Greenbriar Rd/Longleaf Pine Pkwy intersection (Greenbriar Road Improvements), at an estimated cost of $8,162,869.

Read the details here: Consent Agenda Item 4


Regular Agenda Items

Regular Agenda items 1 – 4 and Consent Agenda Items 3 – 4 were heard as one item. This was the Adoption Hearing for the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and PUD for The Landings at Greenbriar and The Landings at St. Johns (Active Adult.)

Because of the great interest in this development and subsequent news coverage, I’m providing a few more pictures from the presentation here. You can watch the full presentation at this link: BOCC Presentation – The Landings

The Landings south of Greenbriar Road
Switzerland Point & Hickory Creek access improvements
Bartram Trail Access Improvements
Slide highlighting future schools
Timeline of construction and improvements
Roadway projects
Additional Roadway Improvements
Student Generation as presented by the developer
Letter from the School Board thanking the developer for improvements
Benefits as described by the developer

Details can be found at the links below.

CPA (SS) 2022-01 The Landings at Greenbriar Comprehensive Plan – The Landings at Greenbriar

“Request for a Small-Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the Future Land Use designation of approximately 31.8 acres of land, located south of Greenbriar Road, approximately one (1) mile west of Longleaf Pine Parkway, from Rural/Silviculture (R/S) to Residential-B (Res-B) with site specific text amendment stating that in locations where the subject property is contiguous to The Landings at St. Johns site, no Development Edges will be required. This request was heard by the Planning and Zoning Agency at their regularly scheduled public hearing on Thursday, August 3, 2023, and was recommended for approval, 5-1.”

PUD 2022-03 The Landings at Greenbriar PUD – The Landings at Greenbriar

“Request to rezone approximately 382 acres of land from Open Rural (OR) to Planned Unit Development (PUD) to allow for a maximum 588 single family residential dwelling units. This request was heard by the Planning and Zoning Agency at their regularly scheduled public hearing on Thursday, August 3, 2023, and was recommended for approval, 5-1.”

COMPAMD 2022-06 The Landings at St. Johns (Active Adult) Comprehensive Plan – The Landings at St. Johns

“Adoption hearing for a Large-Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the Future Land Use Map designation of approximately 581 acres of land, located south of Greenbriar Road and west of Longleaf Pine Parkway, from Rural/Silviculture (R/S) to Residential-B (Res-B) with a site specific text amendment stating that in locations where the subject property is contiguous to The Landings at Greenbriar site, no Development Edges will be required. This request was heard by the Planning and Zoning Agency at their regularly scheduled public hearing on Thursday, August 3, 2023, and was recommended for approval, 5-1.”

PUD 2022-20 The Landings at St. Johns (Active Adult) PUD – The Landings at St. Johns

“Request to rezone approximately 581 acres of land from Open Rural (OR) and Residential, Single Family (RS-2) to Planned Unit Development (PUD) to allow for a maximum 761 age-restricted single family homes. This request is a companion application to COMPAMD 2022-06 The Landings at St. Johns. This request was heard by the Planning and Zoning Agency at their regularly scheduled public hearing on Thursday, August 3, 2023, and was recommended for approval, 5 – 1.”

Public Comment on The Landings

Public Comment began with a presentation by Christine Mullis, representing residents of the 8 existing Greenbriar communities. Ms. Mullis stressed that their largest concern is the small size of. the lots in The Landings and that they are not compatible with the surrounding communities. Additional concerns are that the high density impacts the schools and roadways. She highlighted the overcrowding in the schools today and emphasized that this development will just add to the existing overcrowding.

Communities represented by Ms. Mullis and the lot sizes in each

Additionally, Ms. Mullis raised concerns about the character of the developer, pointing out that the developer asked people to write letters of support and show up at meetings to share their support. She stated that these psople are employers of Pulte or EMT.

Several residents spoke both in favor of and against the development. Those speaking against the development were largely concerned about the impact on schools. Commissioner Joseph had a list of people who had spoken in favor previously who may work for the developer. When these people spoke in favor of the development, she asked them if they worked for the developer. At one point there was a sharp exchange between Commissioner Joseph and Commissioner Whitehurst about the questioning. Commissioner Whitehurst offered that they could stipulate that Commissioner Joseph suspected anyone speaking in favor of the project works for the developer. Commissioner Joseph stated that she only asked if they were on the list of names that had been provided to her.

Commissioner’s Comments

Commissioner Dean stated that he had two elements he considered for developments, compatibility and infrastructure. He liked that the developer has set aside almost 50% of the land for open space and indicated that is why the lot sizes are smaller. For Infrastructure concerns, he felt that the proportionate share was appropriate. He went on to say that one developer should not be held accountable to make up for all the past deficiencies and they were paying their fair share. As for schools, he took the opportunity to explain the limitations created by PECO, Public Education Capital Outlay. PECO is what the legislature appropriates every year for public school construction. This was passed 50 years ago and will only allow for new school construction funds to be released if the new school will be at or above 50% capacity when it opens. He stated that if we think we can deny a project and solve the overcrowding in schools, it is a “fool’s errand.” His comments concluded with the data that we have a 10 year inventory of homes that have been entitled and could be built. With the PECO limitations, we will continue to have portables added because new schools will not be built until the zone is 50% over capacity.

After the long presentations and comments, The Landings at Greenbriar and The Landings at St. Johns were approved 4:1, with Commissioner Joseph the No vote.


The afternoon topics will be shared in a separate post.


If you are finding value in these updates, please subscribe to my blog so you get notifications when I publish an update. Feel free to share with others who may find value in the content.