St. Johns County – Page 2

Key Takeaways from the September 16 BOCC Meeting

Posted on September 21, 2025 by Beth Tate

Tuesday had the very meaty topic of Impact Fees on the Agenda along with several other items. You can watch the entire meeting at this link: September 16 BOCC Meeting

The blog update today will focus on the 3 most critical items of the day and cover an overarching them of the day; turn down the temperature.

Commission Chair Krista Joseph was absent and Commissioner Whitehurst served as Vice-Chair for this meeting. No comment was provided about why Commissioner Joseph was absent although there were hints in closing remarks of the day.

The Meeting opened with a Proclamation Recognizing Constitution Week.

In public comments there were calls to be more civil and to be kind in remarks. This popped up a few times during the day.

Agenda Item 1 – Impact Fee Schedule Update

Please take the time to watch the discussion on the Impact Fees. Impact Fees are widely misunderstood. Soundbites presented on social media are often inaccurate. This was pointed out during the discussion on Impact Fees. Do your own research. Don’t rely on social media posts that may sound confidently correct.

You can watch the full discussion here: Agenda Item 1 – Impact Fees

And the backup documentation is here: Agenda Item 1 – Impact Fee Documentation

There is a new Conservation Impact Fee that was proposed. All the Commissioners were in favor of the Conservation Impact Fee. However, there are still questions lingering. They wanted to understand these questions before raising the fees to the maximum allowed under state law.

Commissioner Whitehurst recommended cutting it in half, with the idea that it could be raised in the future, to give people time to get accustomed to the new fee. If we think this through, there are probably already developments in the works that have built their budgets and plans based on current fee structures. They will need to adjust for this additional fee.

There was also discussion to clarify some misunderstanding about how to set impact fee rates.

Commissioner Murphy indicated he was comfortable that the proposed impact fee increases would satisfy the concerns about paying for new development without going to extraordinary circumstance.

There was consensus to go with the 50% increase and not follow the Extraordinary Circumstances

Commissioner Whitehurst then took the time to address some erroneous information that had been spreading on social media. Watch what he had to say and the explanations here: Commissioner Whitehurst’s Comments on social media posts

Specifically he was addressing some comments that Commissioners had lowered impact fees in 2018. Director Roberson addressed the misunderstandings about what had happened in 2018.

In 2018 the Board chose to implement maximum impact fees. They also chose to ease the transition to the new fees by implementing only 75% of the maximum fees for the first year, from March of 2018 through the end of 2018 (about 9 months.) However, in 2019, the full impact fee kicked in. And in 2019 they implemented the 40% buy down for non-residential impact fees.

Affordable Housing Waiver – 50% reduction for housing built for residents with 80% of AMI

Consensus was reached to apply the Affordable Housing Waiver

Eliminating the Non-Residential Buy-downs

In 2018 the Board established a maximum rate for impact fees and implemented a “buy-down” program for commercial development. The intent was to create incentives for more commercial development in the county and help shift the reliance on residential for Property Tax income. It has not achieved the desired result and the ratio of residential to commercial remains about the same; 85% residential to 15% non-residential. After some discussion confirming that they could still issue economic incentives on a case by case basis, they agreed to eliminate the buy-down.

It was pointed out in the closing discussion on the dais that Impact Fees are NOT borne by the developer but by the end user, the purchaser of the home. Impact fees are paid by the builder, and they passed on to the initial buyer of the home. That increases the cost of a new home for residents in the county. This does not create a scenario of the Developer paying for new construction.

In public comment following the impact Fee discussion, a point was raised that the Commissioners seemed to be listening to each other and having positive dialog on the item in a positive change from recent meetings. Appreciation was expressed for this change in tone during discussion.

Agenda Item 2 – Robinson Improvement Company land Use and Environmental Dispute Resolution Act – “On November 5, 2024, the Board denied Robinson Improvement Company’s request to rezone 2,763 acres to PUD (PUD2024-09). Robinson Improvement filed a request for relief from the denial under the Florida Land Use and Environmental Dispute Resolution Act (“FLUEDRA”). Pursuant to FLUEDRA, the parties mediated the dispute and agreed to ask the Board to schedule a new rezoning hearing. The Board declined. The parties then proceeded to a public hearing before Special Magistrate J. Michael Traynor. Special Magistrate Traynor issued his Report and Recommendations on August 19, 2025. FLUEDRA now requires the Board to consider accepting, modifying, rejecting, or not taking action on the Report and Recommendation.”

Read the back-up materials here: Robinson Improvements

Discussion among the Commissioners resulted in Commissioner Whitehurst making a motion to postpone to seek more information. There was a 2-2 vote which is a technical denial meaning the item will now come back before the board for a hearing.

Agenda Item 3 – Presentation of Phase 1 Proposals for the World Golf Hall of Fame

You can watch the presentation here: Agenda item 3 – World Golf Hall of Fame

Read the presentation here: Agenda Item 3 – Backup Materials

Key slides are below:

The Board voted to move both proposals to Phase 2 for consideration.

While there were several other items on the agenda Tuesday, these were the most critical items and I’ll jump to the Commissioner’s Reports to wrap up the day.

Commissioner’s Reports

Commissioner Taylor shared that she has gained consensus from St. Augustine Beach to support a letter to congress regarding funding for the Guana Preserve. And she shared information about the joint meeting she had with Sheriff Hardwick on the topic of e-bike safety. Sheriff Hardwick and Representative Kendall are pursuing state level legislation around e-bike safety. She also revisited concerns about Nights of Light funding and a desire to have more accountability for how the money is spent. She wanted to form a task force to address these concerns. More information is needed before that can move forward as legal will need to review and make recommendations.

Commissioner Whitehurst reported he is headed to the Innovation and Policy Conference. He has been appointed to be Vice President on the Water and Environmental and Sustainability committee. He will be working with other counties on best practices before the upcoming legislative session. He also took the time to raise concerns about rising violence over the past year the rising number of people willing to justify killing in the name of politics. He brings this forward because he is shifting to a stance to begin bringing forward when people are being ugly and threatening in their rhetoric and asked to “lower the temperature and be more respectiful.”

Watch his comments here: Commissioner Whitehurst Comments

Commissioner Arnold invited all to the Ceremony to celebrate the Black History Museum at 9:00 on Thursday. She also thanked Commissioner Murphy for a smooth, productive and drama free meeting noting that the people in the room and watching could feel and see the difference.

Commissioner Murphy made a motion to provide 10 – 12 loads of available milling asphalt to the American Legion on Pearl Street. Approved 4-0. He also added his own comments piggybacking on Commissioner Whitehurst’s comments about the heated rhetoric. He is also concerned about the uptick in rhetoric that purports to violence on the political scene. His concern is that we should be able to discuss differing opinions if not peacefully, nonviolently.

County Attorney’s Report

Attorney Kommando only asked to keep Commissioner Joseph in your prayers.

Commissioner Murphy added that while respecting her privacy, please keep Commissioner Joseph in your prayers for health.

Editorial Comment:
Tuesday’s meeting was noticeably calmer, with repeated reminders to treat one another with respect. Many left hopeful that civility could finally replace the constant conflict.

Yet, instead of honoring that call, some voices online have chosen to double down on personal attacks and spread inaccurate claims. In the meeting itself, Commissioner Joseph’s privacy was respected and prayers were offered for her health. The suggestion that anything else was said is simply false — and continuing to stir anger only harms our community.

With the 2026 election ahead, St. Johns County deserves better than agendas driven by outrage. We need conversations rooted in truth, not distortion; in collaboration, not division. Turning down the heat is how we protect our county’s future and ensure decisions are made with clarity and respect.

Because in the end, progress doesn’t come from tearing each other down — it comes from connecting people and solving problems together.

If you are finding value in these updates, please subscribe to my blog so you get notifications when I publish an update. Feel free to share with others who may find value in the content.

As it becomes clear who is running in 2026, i will be providing links to their websites and FaceBook pages so you can follow them, learn more about them, and make up your own mind. Links will be posted to the right on my blog page. If you see links I should add, send them over.

St. Johns County

Recap of the August 5 St. Johns County Board of County Commissioner’s Meeting

Posted on August 18, 2025 by Beth Tate

The August 5th Commission meeting was long and included items that were not only important; they were contentious. We’ve been seeing fallout on social media for the past 2 weeks in response to the meeting. My intent here is to provide you links and data so you can read, watch, and come to your own conclusions based on your own impressions and not just soundbites you may see on social media.

The highlight of the opening was a presentation in Remembrance of Bobby Hall, former St. Johns County Fire Chief.

You can watch the video of the presentation here: Chief Bobby Hall Remembrance

Regular Agenda Items

Debate

There was an interesting dialog about additions and deletions to the Regular Agenda for the day. Commissioner Joseph asked to move Agenda Item 9, the Second Reading of proposed Amendments to the Land Development Code – Trees, to the August 19^th Meeting. She indicated that they had just received a legal document an hour before the meeting and had not had time to read the document. Commissioner Taylor motioned to move the item to August 19 and Commissioner Murphy seconded.

A question was raised in Public Comment about whether they could hear it at this meeting and push the vote to August 19 because many people had planned to be at the meeting to speak about the ordinance. The County Attorney advised that since this was a noticed Public Hearing, the Commission has to hear Public Comment.

There was implied that the papers that had been delivered referenced a lawsuit against the County. Commissioner Whitehurst asked the county Attorney if anything in the document would change the information he had provided to them in their briefings as they prepared for the meeting. Attorney Kommando advised this was no different than public comment or an email from any other resident.

Commissioner Murphy suggesting amending the motion that if Commissioner Joseph needed to leave, they defer the hearing to the next meeting.

Commissioner Arnold suggested moving the item to Agenda Item 1, just in case Commissioner Joseph needed to leave.

Commissioner Taylor also pointed out she hadn’t had time to read the documents provided to her that morning.

Commissioner Arnold wanted it put on the record that the documents were delivered the day before, (August 4) and not just that morning. And asked again why it couldn’t be moved to the morning because it was not a time certain on the Agenda.

What was interesting about this debate was the question of when the referenced materials were received. On August 4, in the afternoon, there was a big push on social media for people to show up at a time certain of 1:00 to push back against the developers threatening to sue the County. There were posts complaining that the Developers had not given the residents time to organize against this late threat of a lawsuit. The question then is, how did a member of the public get this packet of information prior to Tuesday’s meeting if it was not delivered on Monday? And why was there a push to show up at a time certain of 1:00 when a time certain was not published on the agenda?

We don’t have the answers to those questions.

The motion to move the item to the 19^th failed, 3:2 with Taylor and Joseph being the Yes votes.

Watch the discussion here: Discussion on Agenda Item 9

Background materials for Agenda Item 9: Agenda Item 9 – Tree Ordinance

Agenda Item 1 – E-Bike Safety Resolution

“A resolution promoting safety for operators of e-bikes, e-scooters, and other electronic motorized devices; encouraging safe usage practices, education, and enforcement efforts; and providing for an effective date.”

This is really more than just a Resolution and it’s important to understand everything they are doing in conjunction with the Resolution.

You can watch the presentation here: E-Bike Resolution Discussion

Director Martin from the Sheriff’s office shared a recap of what they have been doing regarding e-bikes over the summer and what the plans are going forward. SJSO has increased 1 X 1 communication with e-bike riders, created and updated pamphlets about e-bike safety, added QR codes that can be shared to help parents find information. They have had contacts with over 200 e-bike readers over the summer for enforcement or education. One of the big areas of education has involved educating parents to know what they are buying, before they make the purchase for their kids.

They shared that their current actions are to give education and a warning at first contact and enforcement at a second contact. The example provided was an e-bike rider who had been stopped and educated about wearing a helmet previously, was stopped again and this time given a ticket for not wearing a helmet.

They have also partnered with the School District to create opportunities to teach e-bike safety classes within the schools.

The schools have started with education in school assemblies, levels K-8. Commissioner Murphy has been leading a team to work on education solutions for our residents. A curriculum has been developed and the goal is to get that into the school system before Christmas of this year. This will be delivered to all 3 middle school grades before the winter break this year. They are also discussing e-bike camps for hands-on education. Additionally, they are working on web-based education that can be made available to anyone to view; parents, children, trainers, anyone with an interest.

The Resolution was approved unanimously.

Agenda Item 2 – Presentation of St. Johns County’s Annual Comprehensive Financial Report

“The Clerk of the Circuit and County Comptroller’s Office recently published the County’s Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) for the Fiscal Year ending on September 30, 2024. The ACFR is prepared in accordance with Sections 218.32 and 218.39, Florida Statutes, and requires acceptance from the Board of County Commissioners. The County received an unmodified opinion on the fair presentation of its financial statements. The Board should accept the FY 2024 ACFR as audited by Forvis Mazars, the County’s auditing firm. This presentation will allow the Board the opportunity for further discussion with the auditors. The ACFR and SAS 114 letter are available on the Clerk’s website: Financial Report”

The auditors presented a clean audit report:

“The independent accounting firm of Forvis Mazars, LLP, whose report is included herein, has audited the county’s financial statements. The goal of the independent audit was to provide reasonable assurance that the financial statements of the county are free of material misstatement. The independent audit involved examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by county management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Based upon the audit, Forvis Mazars, LLP concluded that there was a reasonable basis for rendering an unmodified opinion that the county’s financial statements are fairly presented in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2024.”

Some items were brought up during Public Comment on this item that are worth clarifying. There is frequently a reference to a fraud event in the SJSO that was investigated and addressed in 2021. Under Auditing Standards, the auditor only includes items pertinent to the current audit period. This report was for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2024 so the 2021 Fraud event would not be included in the audit report unless it was on-going.

A question was asked about why an external auditor was paid to perform the audit. That is required by state statute (in addition to being best practice.) It’s important to have an independent audit firm conduct audits of any governmental or corporate organization.

The report was approved unanimously.

Agenda Item 3 – Enclave at World Golf (Workforce Housing)

“Request to rezone approximately 18.5 acres of land from Planned Unit Development (PUD) to Workforce Housing (WH), located at 3740 Pacetti Road. The Planning and Zoning Agency (PZA) heard this request at their regularly scheduled public hearing on June 26, 2025. The Agency recommended denial with a vote of 4-2, with support of the denial made by members Hilsenbeck, Spiegel, Labanowski and Olson. Dissenting votes were cast by Perkins and Green. Member Matovina was absent. During the meeting, the applicant provided an updated Traffic Study and pointed out the desire to develop up to 63 townhomes on the subject site. Discussion was made regarding area road improvements, the affordable housing units within Samara Lakes, the effectiveness of the Workforce Housing product, whether eligible renter/buyer households would need to have dual incomes, and the increase in onsite wetlands, traffic, proposed U-turns, and student safety.”

This was denied 5-0

Agenda Items 5 & 6 – Schneider Family Campground

This was a request to rezone 77 acres of land from Open Rural to Commercial Rural with conditions. The property is located at 8000 US Hwy 1 South and is about 2.25 miles south of State Road 206.

There was much interesting discussion on this item, including concerns about a completely separate RV Resort. It was ultimately approved 5-0.

You can watch the video here: Agenda Items 5 & 6

Agenda Item 7 – Public Hearing on Proposed Increases to Solid Waste Special Assessments.

This is an item of import to every resident and there have been many questions and concerns about the increase. It is worth your time to watch the presentation and the Commissioner’s discussion before their vote.

I’m including slides here. Some important points that came out in the presentation:

All homeowners pay the same rate for Waste Collection services; it is not pro-rated based on assessed value of your home or size of your lot. It’s the same for everyone.
There is financial assistance available for those that cannot afford the fees. The County does not want to be in the business of placing liens on homes.
The verbiage in the letter sent to residents is required by law.
The fees included are the MAXIMUM that can be charged and the county will continue to work diligently to keep the costs low.

Further notes below.

Interesting note on Level of Service. The Level of Service in the bid was for Unlimited handling of each type of waste. Republic Service, that previously served the northern part of the county had already moved to automated service only for recycling and did not want to bid on Unlimited Waste handling for the full county.

Note that the 2nd lowest bid was significantly higher than FCC’s bid. Waste Management, who previously served the southern part of the county submitted a bid almost 2x the FCC Bid.

This is the full chart for 5 years. It is the maximum that could be charged.

The counties with an asterisk are in the process of evaluating their rates for 2026. Note that Clay County does not provide recycling pick-up.

During Public Comment concerns were raised about a few items:

Short Term Rentals are not paying their fair share. They pay the same rate while they may have many times more trash cans to be picked up. The County confirmed this is something they are looking at addressing in the future.
Some residents suggested eliminating recycling or changing it to every 2 weeks. This would increase the amount of waste tonnage to be dealt with so there would be little cost savings associated with such a move. Residents who do recycle heavily would also be negatively impacted.
There were suggestions to go to every other week on yard waste. For many neighborhoods this would be an unacceptable level of service.

The motion to accept the maximum increase was approved 5-0.

Watch the discussion here: Agenda Item 8 – Waste Collection Fees

Agenda Item 9 – Proposed Amendments to the Land Development Code – Tree Ordinance

The County consultant presented the proposed updates to the Tree Ordinance

As anticipated based on the discussion at the beginning of the meeting, this was a contentious discussion. It is important to watch the discussion yourself and hear the explanations provided before coming to a conclusion about the final vote.

You can watch here: Agenda Item 9 – Tree Ordinance

The first motion, to approve all 3 changes was voted down, 2-3, with Murphy, Arnold and Whitehurst being the no votes.

After more discussion, the first two items, Specimen Tree Measurement and Tree Bank Fund Increase were approved 3-2 with Whitehurst and Arnold being the No votes.

If you are finding value in these updates, please subscribe to my blog so you get notifications when I publish an update. Feel free to share with others who may find value in the content.

St. Johns County

Recap of the July 22 SJC Board of County Commissioner’s Meeting

Posted on August 3, 2025August 3, 2025 by Beth Tate

The July 22 Board of Commissioners meeting was long and covered a number of critical topics. There have a been a number of “sound bites” circulating on Social Media. My goal here is to give you the full context around some of those sound bites and give you the materials for you to read, watch, and come to your own conclusions.

Let’s start with an important Consent Agenda item that has been of concern, the Agreement with FCC Environmental Services Florida, LLC and the upcoming waste collection fee increase.

During Public Comment on changes to the Consent Agenda, item 35 from the Consent Agenda was raised as a concern. The item is the “Agreement with FCC Environmental Services Florida, LLC”

Link to the background document is here: FCC Agreement Item

Background:

“In August 2024, certain disputes arose between the County and FCC regarding FCC’s performance under its Hauling Agreement with the County. As such, the County withheld payment of the August 2024 solid waste invoice. Through contract required mediation, the County and FCC have resolved its dispute pursuant to the terms in the Agreement. FCC agrees to reimburse the County for actual costs it incurred in providing services under the Hauling Agreement during August 2024, and an agreed upon settlement amount. Since the payment for August 2024 services was withheld and not included in the FY 2026 Solid Waste budget, a transfer from reserves is necessary to pay the balance of the August 2024 invoice.”

Payments in the settlement were:

FCC to reimburse the County for actual costs it incurred during August 2024, and an agreed settlement amount for a total amount of One Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,500,000.00).

In turn, the County paid to FCC the payment for August, 2024 services of $900,750.80.

The settlement was agreed to through mediation.

Currently FCC is meeting their contractual obligations to the county for waste collection.

Commissioner Murphy asked Public Works Director Greg Caldwell what the cost to the county would be if we went back out to bid at this time.

If the County went with the 2^nd lowest bid from 2 years ago, the price to the county would be almost double what is being paid now. That equate to about $500-$600 per resident.

Based on the prices from 2 years ago, it would be $1 Million per month higher than what we are paying now. ($12 Million dollar increase to our budget.)

The August 5 BOCC Meeting includes a Public Hearing on the Proposed Increases to Solid Waste Special Assessments. Details here: August 5 BOCC Item – Solid Waste Increase

To put in context the increase in Waste Collection, they are proposing an increase from the current $256 to $334 a year for 2026. That’s a $6.50 a month increase.

I would encourage you to watch the full discussion on the agreement at this link and not rely on the sound bites from the media. FCC Discussion

Regular Agenda Items

Agenda Item 1, the budget discussion, was moved to the end of the day to accommodate allowing staff to attend the funeral services for former Fire Chief Robert Hall.

Agenda Item 2 – Andre Land Holdings Workforce Housing

“Request to rezone approximately 11.37 acres of land from Open Rural (OR) to Workforce Housing (WH), located at 3165 County Road 208, Unit F. The Planning and Zoning Agency (PZA) heard this request at their regularly scheduled public hearing on June 5, 2025. The Agency recommended denial with a vote of 6-0, supported by members Perkins, Matovina, Hilsenbeck, Spiegel, Green, and Labanowski. Members discussed several issues, including specimen trees, pricing, number of units, housing types, area compatibility, and proposed density. Public comments addressed existing rural uses in the area such as livestock management, poultry, equine activities, fishing ponds, and recreational shooting. Discussions included potential impacts on area school overcrowding, as well as opinions that townhomes may not be suitable for the area, noting that there are currently too many unsold townhome units in the County. More information is provided in the Staff Report.“

Video of the presentation and vote is here: Agenda Item 2

Commissioner Arnold made a motion to deny the project and it was approved unanimously. (that means the project was denied.)

Agenda Item 4 – Powers Center

This was a request to rezone approximately 1.88 acres of land from Industrial Warehousing (IW) to Planned Unit Development (PUD) to allow for a maximum 36,000 square feet of non-residential uses, specifically located at 9990 US-1 North.

PZA did not recommend approval (2-4 vote).

The area is in between two other commercial developments already in place.

BOCC approved the request 4-1 (Joseph voting no)

Agenda Items 5 & 6

These were both updates to the Land Development Code.

Item 5 was a Second Reading, “Updates to Land Development Code (LDC) Articles II, III, V, VI, IX, and XII, and the Table of Contents, to maintain consistency with Florida Statutes and to better organize existing parts of the code. The Planning and Zoning Agency voted on May 15, 2025 to recommend approval of this item 5-0. The Board of County Commissioners heard this item for first reading on June 17, 2025.The Board had no questions and no members of the public spoke during public comment.”

Link to details on Item 5 is here: Agenda Item 5

Item 6 was a First Reading, “This amendment amends Land Development Code Section 5.01.00 Subdivisions to maintain consistency with changes to State Statute that went into effect on July 1, 2025 with the enactment of Senate Bill 784. The bill requires administrative approval of a plat or replat submitted pursuant to F.S. 177.091 according to certain processing criteria. The bill also requires passage of an ordinance designating an administrative authority to manage plat and replat submittals and render approval decisions. The amendment designates the Director of Growth Management Department as the administrative authority. This change to Florida law went into effect on July 1, 2025. The Board may choose to waive the second hearing required by St. Johns County Board of County Commissioners Rules and Policies Rule 3.103 (Introduction of Legislation) through implementation of Rule 1.103 (Suspension of Standing Rules). Such Board action requires a motion and vote of a majority plus one of the Commissioners present.”

Link to details on Item 6 is here: Agenda Item 6

Agenda Item 7 – Proposed Amendments to the Land Development Code – Tree Ordinance

This was the first hearing of the long-awaited update to the Tree Ordinance. The Second Reading is scheduled for the August 5 Meeting.

“First Hearing by the BCC on proposed Land Development Code, considering proposed “red-line” changes with regards to updates to the method of measuring and designating Specimen trees (LDC Article IV), increasing the per-inch Tree Deficiency Charge from $25.00 to $100.00 (LDC Article IV) and increase of the minimum preservation of upland natural vegetation required for certain Planned Urban Developments from 5% preserved to 10% preserved (LDC Article V). Also, a change to the definition of Specimen Tree is proposed in Article XII for consistency with the relevant change in Article IV.”

The link to the discussion is here: Agenda Item 7 – Tree Ordinance

The background materials, including the red line changes is here: Agenda Item 7 – Red Line Tree Ordinance

Key Slides

Agenda Item 8 – 2050 Comprehensive Plan – Transmittal Hearing

Watch here: Agenda Item 8 – Comp Plan Transmittal Hearing

This was a very long item and some of the most important points were discussed in the Commissioner’s discussion, after the Public Comment. You can watch the full video at the link above or just go straight to the Commissioner’s discussion at the link below.

To watch just the Commissioner’s Discussion on the topic, go to this link: Video of Commissioner’s Discussion

There has been some criticism of including a revision of Res-D density to increase from 13 – 16 units per acre. It’s important to view this in it’s full context. There was a proposal that rather than expand the Development Boundaries in order to provide more Workforce Housing in the County, the Res-D density could be increased from 13 to 20 units per acre. After discussion, the compromis was to increase from 13 to 16 units per acre.

Key Slides from the presentation:

Agenda Item 1 – Fiscal Year 2026 Recommended Budget & Proposed Millage Rates

Watch the full presentation here: Budget Presentation

Watch discussion of the Recommended Budget here: Budget Discussion

You can review the full Budget Details at this link: St Johns County 2026 Budget Recommendations

Key Slides are here – but do watch the entire presentation to get the full context

The first set of slides is from the County Administrator’s Recap of key accomplishments related to the County’s budget for the past year.

The following slides speak to the highlights in the 2026 budget recommendations.

These slides walk through the budget process and the recommended 2026 budget.

The next set of slides starts to tie together the Budget and impact on Property Taxes.

And now we get into the Truth in Millage or TRIM and how it impacts our Property Tax Bills.

With much discussion about whether we need a rollback, here are the sides explaining the impacts of a rollback.

This slide was a requested comparison of St Johns County millage rates compared to surrounding counties.

The Budget passed 3:2 (Joseph, Taylor)

The First Public Hearing of the Budget is scheduled for September 3 at 5:01 PM.

What’s Ahead on October 5?

Items of interest at the August 5 BOCC Meeting include

E-Bike Safety Resolution

St. Johns County’s Annual Financial Report

The Public Hearing on Proposed Increases to Solid Waste Special Assessments

2nd Reading of the Tree Ordinance

If you are finding value in these updates, please subscribe to my blog so you get notifications when I publish an update. Feel free to share with others who may find value in the content.

BOCC, St. Johns County

Recap of the June 3 St. Johns County Board of County Commissioner’s Meeting

Posted on June 12, 2025 by Beth Tate

The June 3 BOCC meeting was another long day and one full of overwhelming positivity and support!

The day began with a Retirement Recognition of Timothy Pugh, Fire Rescue Engineer. It is always heartwarming to see the outpouring of thanks for a first responder as they retire from the force. You can watch the recognition here Fire Rescue Retirement

Following that recognition was the Graduation of the Saint Johns County 101 Citizens Academy class of 2025. This is a new program started by County Administrator Joy Andrews and has been a great success. I spoke with a couple of the class members before the meeting began and they were so impressed with what they learned! They theme I heard was how much more appreciation they had for the dedicated and hard working county employees that we take for granted every day.

Watch the ceremony here: Graduation Ceremony

Learn more about the program here: SJC 101 Citizens Academy

Commissioner Whitehurst made a motion to move Agenda Item 1 (2050 Comprehensive Plan Workshop) to the end of the meeting.

Commission Chair Joseph was opposed to moving the item to the end because of its importance to the county’s future. She recognized that many in the auditorium were there to speak either in support of or against County Administrator Joy Andrews (Item 2 on the Agenda was discussion on Ms. Andrews contract.) Commissioner Joseph said it would be better for people to speak about that topic in Public Comment so they could keep Agenda Item #1 where it was on the agenda.

The Regular Agenda was approved as is and the Board moved into Public Comment. You can watch the full Public Comment here: 0603 Public Comment

Public Comment went on for almost 2 hours with 32 speakers (including myself) speaking in support of Ms. Andrews in her role as County Administrator. Four of the speakers brought up the very negative social media attacks and indicated they need to stop. Three speakers urged the Board to start working together in a more collegial manner.

By the conclusion of this Public Comment, it was close to lunch time, so recess was declared before getting into the Regular Agenda items.

Regular Agenda Item 1 – 2050 Comprehensive Plan Workshop

You can watch the workshop here: 2050 Comp Plan Workshop

I’ve included some key slides but do encourage you to watch the very important discussion on this topic. You’ll get a much better understanding of the proposed changes by watching rather than looking for key sound bites.

Agenda Item 2 – Board Discussion on the Terms of County Administrator’s Contract

Commissioner Whitehurst had asked that this be put on the Agenda following conversation at the May 20 evening meeting. He was concerned that some of the questions and commentary about Ms. Andrews at that meeting occurred at 10:00 at night and wanted the opportunity to have that discussion in the next meeting where more people could have visibility to the discussion.

Ms. Andrews was given an opportunity to explain her application for the position of County Administrator in Palm Beach County. In short, based on feedback she had recently from the board, she was concerned about the long term prospects of her role here in St. Johns County. She felt she had to make the right decision to be able to support her family so she applied for the other role. In response to the reaction from the public, her staff, and her children, she reconsidered and withdrew her application. St. Johns County is her home and she wants to continue her role here.

The discussion and additional public comment are here: Agenda Item 2

Again, I encourage you to watch for yourself to gain an understanding of the concerns and responses.

Commissioner Whitehurst offered his concerns about maintaining the stability of the staff in the County and made a motion to extend Ms. Andrews’ contract for 6 years. Commissioner Murphy countered with a 3 year extension.

Commissioner Murphy shared that in the months he has been on the Board he has heard nothing but accolades and he is fully supportive of Joy.

Commissioner Joseph commented that she hadn’t seen goals accomplished by Ms. Andrews, including not having landed the Black History Museum that was not voted on by the State Legislature as Commissioner Arnold reminded the Board.

Public comment from residents included a speaker on behalf of the St. Johns County Firefighters who are in full support of Ms. Andrews There were 4 other speakers supporting Ms. Andrews and more admonitions about the negativity on social media and requests for the Board to work together.

The Contract extension was approved 3:2 with Commissioners Joseph and Taylor being the no votes.

Regular Agenda Item 3 – Constitutional Officers’ Fiscal Year 2026 Budget Presentations

Tuesday’s presentation was from the Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroller and the Property Appraiser. It was pointed out that the budgets of the Tax Collector and the Property Appraiser are approved by the State Department of Revenue, not the local Commission, as their budgets are fee based. They are not required to submit their budgets to the county but the Property Appraiser has elected to do so. The Sheriff and Supervisor of Elections will be presenting their budgets at the June 17 Board meeting.

It was noticed that TRIM notices are scheduled to be mailed August 15 to the 181,000 Taxpayers in St. Johns County.

Agenda Item 4 – O’Hara Family Property – Public Hearing to vacate a portion of Poinsettia Road Right-of-way. Little discussion on a minor request, approved unanimously.

Agenda Item 5 – SJC Central Sportsplex – this request is for a Non-Zoning Variance to allow for a County Park to utilize Scenic Edge standards, to allow for reduced performance standards in a portion of the Development Edge, and to allow for overflow parking within the scenic Edge. The site is at the corner of County Road 16A and Timberwolf Trail. Approved unanimously.

Watch the presentation here: SJC Sports Complex

Agenda Item 6 – Proposed E-Bike Ordinance – discussion item

Watch the video here: E-Bike Discussion

Draft Ordinance is here: E-Bike Ordinance

There was robust discussion on the item; I encourage you to watch the discussion including the exchange with Director Martin from the St. Johns County Sheriff’s Office.

Director Martin shared that SJSO has been reallocating manpower to educate students and issued a Call to Action to parents. They talked about the importance of working with HOAs to create new rules and regulations within their communities to assist with the issue, as well.

The overarching concern was the ability of SJSO to have the manpower and resources to enforce some of the proposed elements in the Ordinance.

The item concluded with consensus to draft a resolution about the education and enforcement of existing laws for e-bikes. This will come back to the Board for additional discussion.

Agenda item 7 – Adoption Hearing for a Comprehensive plan Amendment needed to comply with Section 163.3177 of the Florida Statutes related to the 2023 North Florida Regional Water Supply Plan.

“This is the adoption hearing for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to amend Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the St. Johns County 2025 Comprehensive Plan in order to comply with Section 163.3177, Florida Statutes, with the issuance of the 2023 North Florida Regional Water Supply Plan. The statute requires local governments to amend their Comprehensive Plans to include selected projects from the updated regional water supply plan and to update its Water Supply Facilities Work Plan, adopted by reference in the Comprehensive Plan. The amendment was brought before the PZA on March 6, 2025, for a motion to recommend transmittal to state agencies for review. There were minor comments and questions from Agency members along with one public comment on aquifer withdrawal. The Agency subsequently voted unanimously to approve the motion. On April 1, 2025, the amendment was brought in front of the BCC for a motion to transmit to state agencies for review. Staff answered questions from the Chair on alternative water supply projects that the County has selected. In addition, a public comment was discussed on gray water availability for reuse. The BCC subsequently unanimously approved the motion to transmit. The amendment was sent out for state agency review on April 4, 2025. No substantial comments or concerns with the amendment were received from the state agencies by the 30-day deadline. Staff intends to bring the amendment to the PZA again on May 15, 2025, for a recommendation to adopt and will verbally advise the Board of any issues or questions asked.”

This was approved unanimously.

Agenda Item 8 – “Adopting and approving the final schedules of rates, deposits, charges, fees, and costs relating to the use or availability of water, wastewater, and reclaimed water services pursuant to the St. Johns County Utility Ordinance for FY2025, creating a single set of rates for the North Beach and Main System and establishing an effective date.”

Approved unanimously

Agenda Item 9 – Appointments to the Planning and Zoning Agency due to the resignation of Elvis Pierre. Commissioner Joseph made a motion to appoint Bob Olson. She indicated her support for Joe McAnarney but felt the rest of the Board would not support him so she wanted to put forward Bob Olson. Commissioners Whitehurst and Arnold asked if Dick Williams couldn’t be discussed.

Commissioner Joseph indicated she felt Mr. Olson would be fair and objective. He was approved 4-1 with Commissioner Arnold being the no vote.

Agenda Item 10 – Appointment to the Industrial Development Authority – Susan Phillips was the recommended appointee and approved 5-0.

Commissioner’s Reports

Commissioner Joseph shared a video from about Veterans Village. You can watch the video here: Veterans Village

Commissioner Whitehurst invited Misty Dzion to share about the loss of her son that led to the enactment of Connor’s Law, requiring truck drivers to be proficient in the English Language. Watch her presentation here: Connor’s Law Presentation

Commissioner Taylor asked for consensus for the County to send a letter of opposition to SB 180, asking that Governor DeSantis veto the bill. That bill includes more local preemption language. Commissioner Arnold shared that she had already reached out to members of our local delegation “who have unanimously voted yes” on this bill. She was reluctant to sign on to this letter when our entire delegation had voted in favor of it. Commissioner Whitehurst added that he had spoken with Senator Leek and Representative Kendall about the bill. In their view this bill helps people get back in their homes more quickly. While he also disagrees with parts of the Bill, he was also reluctant to sign onto the letter asking Governor DeSantis to veto a bill that our state delegation had voted to pass. Commissioner Joseph stated she would be sending a letter to Governor DeSantis asking him to veto it because she is concerned about the trees.

County Administrator’s Report – Ms. Andrews congratulated the staff on receiving the 2025 Urban Deal of the Year from the Florida Economic Development Council for the Publix pharmaceutical manufacturing facility to be built on 210. The project is planned to open in 2026 and will bring 400 new jobs with a salary over $100,00. Learn more about the project here: Urban Deal of the Year

She asked for, and received, consensus to promote a St. Johns County Day for the 2026 Legislative Session.

County Attorney’s Report – reminder that financial disclosure reports are due at the end of the month and announced the promotion of Kealey West to Deputy Attorney.

If you are finding value in these updates, please subscribe to my blog so you get notifications when I publish an update. Feel free to share with others who may find value in the content.

Guana Preserve, St. Johns County

Land Swap Withdrawn!

Posted on May 19, 2025 by Beth Tate

Latest news on the Guana Land Swap – the applicant has withdrawn their request!

Maybe one day we will learn the true identify of the applicant and understand their true intentions.

The ARC Meeting Agenda has been update to show Agenda Item 4 is Withdrawn. Link here: Updated ARC Agenda

If you are finding value in these updates, please subscribe to my blog so you get notifications when I publish an update. Feel free to share with others who may find value in the content.

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this: